Also, the source repo for vagrant itself is https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant ... but I think the RPMs and other packaging is generated by https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Ido Rosen <[email protected]> wrote: > The official distribution is the RPM/DEB/binary distribution. The > ruby-vagrant package is different - I don't believe it is based on > vagrant-installers. If we wanted to not use the RPMs (which are very > self-contained) but still have a low-maintenance way of packaging this, we > could start here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers > > Ido > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Anatol Pomozov <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ido Rosen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful >> tool >> > for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR; >> > however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you >> TUs >> > could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get >> > wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent, >> so >> > it has been very easy to maintain overall. >> > >> > AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ >> > Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/ >> > >> > Also, if you'd like to make changes to the PKGBUILD in AUR, you can >> submit >> > a pull request on GitHub: https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux (under >> > the aur/vagrant directory). >> >> I see that it uses *.rpm file as a source. Does this project have source >> repo? >> >> Is ruby-vagrant aur package (built from sources) the same as your package? >> > >
