On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 19:34, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful tool > > for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR; > > however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you TUs > > could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get > > wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent, so > > it has been very easy to maintain overall. > > > > AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ > > Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/ > > [...] > > I use this a bit and was considering moving it to community when I had a > bit more time. If no one steps up in the next week or so then I'll start > looking at moving it/the best way to package it.
Vagrant has been updated in the AUR using my proposed installation method (not using the rpm file). This means needing 22 ruby-* packages. Please share comments/suggestions/concerns either here or in the comments: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ I plan to move it to [community] along with dependencies by the end of the week, unless concerns/issues arise. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel
pgpQtdcpwd50Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
