On 04/04/14 05:38 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> 1. According to the comments, xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 is just a
> duplicate of xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git. It has been orphaned.
> The only difference in PKGBUILDs (apart from the package name) is that
> xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 has 2 extra makedependencies: git and
> xorg-util-macros.  At least git shold be added to the makedepends (as
> pointed out in the comments of
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/ by
> klusark - the user who uploaded xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 - but I
> think xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 should be removed.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2/

I removed the -git2 package. Can you email the maintainer of the -git
package and ask them to include the dependencies?

> 2. Are we OK with a package like
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-conf-sna/ that
> provides only a 5-line config:

SNA is now the default, so I removed this. I think this kind of thing
can be useful, but in this case it wasn't :).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to