On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Micay <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/04/14 05:38 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >> 1. According to the comments, xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 is just a >> duplicate of xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git. It has been orphaned. >> The only difference in PKGBUILDs (apart from the package name) is that >> xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 has 2 extra makedependencies: git and >> xorg-util-macros. At least git shold be added to the makedepends (as >> pointed out in the comments of >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/ by >> klusark - the user who uploaded xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 - but I >> think xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 should be removed. >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2/ > > I removed the -git2 package. Can you email the maintainer of the -git > package and ask them to include the dependencies?
Thanks and done. > >> 2. Are we OK with a package like >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-conf-sna/ that >> provides only a 5-line config: > > SNA is now the default, so I removed this. I think this kind of thing > can be useful, but in this case it wasn't :). >
