On Friday 16 May 2014 00:10:54 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 2014 03:27:30 +0400 > > Evgeniy Alekseev <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 May 2014 20:20:23 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just updated the pipe [1] PKGBUILD. There is also pipe2 [2], > > > which is the same program, but outdated (last updated in 2012). > > > > > > The best thing here would be to merge them into 'pipe2'. > > > > If we will merge pipe into pipe2 all PKGBUILD changes will be lost. > > Do you want merge pipe right now? > > Yes, no problem. Are you going to disown pipe2, I suppose?
Unfortunately, according to our rules [1] you should contact with its current maintainer first and wait for a response for two weeks. Pipe2 have not any comments about out-of-dating and the package was marked as out-of-date just today by me. And I cannot say for sure that its current maintainer is inactive (but his last action was in 2012). Tl;dr: if I merge it now, perhaps there will be no actual version of the package for two weeks =) 1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Other_requests -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: [email protected] ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
