On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:16:05 +0200 Lukas Jirkovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know the project, but isn't pipe better name that pipe2? I > skimmed over the web and they sometimes refer to it as PIPE, sometimes > as PIPE2, the current version is PIPEv4.x.y and the documentation says > PIPE 5. This suggests that the -2 actually refers to a(n old) version > and in that case "pipe" would be more appropriate. Also, in that case > I could merge pipe2 into pipe immediately. > > Lukas
Well, I suggested the main name of the project to be PIPE2 because both the old development website [1] and the current one [2] refer to it as PIPE2. I agree with you, all these versions seem confusing, but I find 'pipe' to be a name too generic. At least, 'pipe2' usually returns better search results with your favorite search engine than simply 'pipe'. [1]: http://pipe2.sourceforge.net/ [2]: https://github.com/sarahtattersall/PIPE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
