Am 06.08.2014 um 14:31 schrieb Florian Bruhin:
Hi,
I'm maintaining the vim-full[1] package which is a vim with all the
gvim features (Ruby/Lua/Python/Perl/Netbeans) but without GTK/X.
Now obviously I have to depend on vim-runtime, and I currently I have
the version number pinned (just like the vim package).
However that makes upgrading vim-runtime difficult, because pacman
doesn't know about the vim-full upgrade. A possible solution is to
build via `makepkg -d` (ignoring the old vim-runtime version), then
upgrading both vim-full and vim-runtime.
Should I just not pin the version at all (as in "partial upgrades
aren't supported anyways") to avoid these problems?
Florian
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-full/
I'd say, regarding pinning keep it as it is.
I have other issues: Built from AUR, this is not an official Arch Linux
package, so you should use
--with-compiledby="$PACKAGER" instead of --with-compiledby='Arch Linux'
(users who do not set PACKAGER in their makepkg.conf will get an empty string,
but this is their fault)
And: If this is named -full, it should be full, so also python3 should be
supported.
Best Regards
Stefan
