Sorry for the rather late answer here :)

* Stefan Husmann <[email protected]> [2014-08-06 19:45:24 +0200]:
> I have other issues: Built from AUR, this is not an official Arch Linux 
> package, so you should use
> 
> --with-compiledby="$PACKAGER"  instead of --with-compiledby='Arch Linux'
> 
> (users who do not set PACKAGER in their makepkg.conf will get an empty 
> string, but this is their fault)

Thanks, fixed.

* Johannes Löthberg <[email protected]> [2014-08-06 23:39:29 +0200]:
> On 06/08, Daniel Micay wrote:
> >It's necessary to choose between python2 and python3 support.
> >
> 
> IIRC both can be compiled in, but only one can be used at runtime

Hmm, *compiling* it with both flags works, but not sure what happens
at runtime then? Arch seems to provide a gvim and a gvim-python3
package, and I suspect there is some reason for that.

I'll ask the gvim-maintainer, I'd guess he knows more :)

* Johannes Löthberg <[email protected]> [2014-08-06 16:14:26 +0200]:
> On 06/08, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> >Now obviously I have to depend on vim-runtime, and I currently I have
> >the version number pinned (just like the vim package).
> >
> 
> Why would you have to depend on it? Either include it in the package or
> build a split package yourself.

That is a good point. Ended up including it, and adding it to
provides/conflicts.

Thanks for all your help!

Florian

-- 
http://www.the-compiler.org | [email protected] (Mail/XMPP)
             GPG 0xFD55A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
         I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/

Attachment: pgpsNxqZiVJNz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to