On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:16:57 +0100 (CET) Alad Wenter via aur-general <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Doug Newgard via aur-general <[email protected]> hat am 9. Februar > > 2018 um 16:22 geschrieben: > > > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:13:37 -0200 > > Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I don't see it as mandatory, but if I was the maintainer of this > > > development package I would do as the developer says and request > > > package deletion. > > > > > > > I, on the other hand, wouldn't. The entire point of -<vcs> packages is to > > run > > the incomplete development code, anyone that's running it should understand > > that it's incomplete and potentially unstable. > > > I don't see how that justifies explicitely going the wishes of upstream. If > the author doesn't want feedback on his development code, that's his choice > and it's not our place to motivate him otherwise by keeping this package. > > Alad Getting feedback on the code doesn't have much do to with the existence of this package. Two totally different issues.
