On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:16:57 +0100 (CET)
Alad Wenter via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:

> > Doug Newgard via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> hat am 9. Februar 
> > 2018 um 16:22 geschrieben:
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:13:37 -0200
> > Rafael Fontenelle <rafae...@gnome.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > I don't see it as mandatory, but if I was the maintainer of this
> > > development package I would do as the developer says and request
> > > package deletion.
> > >   
> > 
> > I, on the other hand, wouldn't. The entire point of -<vcs> packages is to 
> > run
> > the incomplete development code, anyone that's running it should understand
> > that it's incomplete and potentially unstable.
> >  
> I don't see how that justifies explicitely going the wishes of upstream. If 
> the author doesn't want feedback on his development code, that's his choice 
> and it's not our place to motivate him otherwise by keeping this package.
> 
> Alad

Getting feedback on the code doesn't have much do to with the existence of this
package. Two totally different issues.

Reply via email to