> > Thanks for the info about the local pseudo-scheme. I've made a note to > > file a feature request on bugs.archlinux.org, asking for documentation. > > (Obligatory "and maybe a patch, but don't count on it.") And I'll switch to > > using it. > > Documentation is always good! You're not the first one to ask about > where local:// is documented, I think, but documentation issues are > difficult to remember without a bug report when the people most likely > to be writing documentation think it is obvious because they've read the > implementation. :p
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61294
