The Package godot-next-bin was deleted previously cause it was identical to 
godot-preview-bin. We can see in the git history it was the same. freehuntx has 
recreated it, with an disingenuous comment against me.

Because of a mistake of mine, sending deletion requests for packages they had 
given up for a span of 2 days (until they realized that it wasn't an decision 
process initiated by the AUR Maintainers, but by me), the maintainer freehuntx 
does assume i am a malicious actor and am actively hurting the open source 
community.

The previous successful delete-request implies preference for the 
godot-preview-bin package as a name, and the one benefit of now providing a 
mono build should be in godot-preview-bin
I do not think freehuntx should be maintainer for any package that just 
repackages godot versions, and through their implicit presumptions that 
packages (for software that he doesn't even develop in the case of 
godot-next-bin) that they maintain are in their ownership, is hurting the open 
source spirit (a thing they accuse me regularly (in the comments of 
godot-beta-bin and godot-next-bin)) more than me making mistakes.

I personally do see a case for godot-beta-bin to exist, but frankly that one is 
just excluding dev builds out of the whole process that godot-preview-bin does 
too. And possibly also RC versions, cause that package hasnt been updated ever 
to include RC versions.

I am not sending a request (merge, delete, orphan) of any kind here for 
godot-next-bin, because i think this is a issue for moderation and freehuntx 
would probably just remake those packages.

Reply via email to