This was already handled privately. Please ignore. Nova Bürky <[email protected]> schrieb am Montag, 19. Januar 2026 um 05:47:
> The Package godot-next-bin was deleted previously cause it was identical to > godot-preview-bin. We can see in the git history it was the same. freehuntx > has recreated it, with an disingenuous comment against me. > > Because of a mistake of mine, sending deletion requests for packages they had > given up for a span of 2 days (until they realized that it wasn't an decision > process initiated by the AUR Maintainers, but by me), the maintainer > freehuntx does assume i am a malicious actor and am actively hurting the open > source community. > > The previous successful delete-request implies preference for the > godot-preview-bin package as a name, and the one benefit of now providing a > mono build should be in godot-preview-bin > I do not think freehuntx should be maintainer for any package that just > repackages godot versions, and through their implicit presumptions that > packages (for software that he doesn't even develop in the case of > godot-next-bin) that they maintain are in their ownership, is hurting the > open source spirit (a thing they accuse me regularly (in the comments of > godot-beta-bin and godot-next-bin)) more than me making mistakes. > > I personally do see a case for godot-beta-bin to exist, but frankly that one > is just excluding dev builds out of the whole process that godot-preview-bin > does too. And possibly also RC versions, cause that package hasnt been > updated ever to include RC versions. > > I am not sending a request (merge, delete, orphan) of any kind here for > godot-next-bin, because i think this is a issue for moderation and freehuntx > would probably just remake those packages.
