At 11:48 AM 4/22/2016, you wrote:
GFA were left with 2 simple choices - fix the documentation (and requirements) to meet with CASA audit approval in a very short time frame or lose all airworthiness delegation with no prospect of CASA being able to pick up, with the end result, grounding all Australian registered gliders.


Really?

CASA is required by Parliament to administer the safety of civil aviation in Australia. All of it. Gliders are VH registered Australian aircraft, ICAO recognised. If the GFA doesn't do it CASA can delegate to some other individual delegate or do it itself. CASA Sport Aviation

did in fact issue Experimental certificates when GFA lost that ability due to failing an audit.

In the last couple of years I've heard from many long term glider pilots (30+ years in the activity). I've heard offers of substantial sums of money to get rid of Denis Stacy, the bloke who introduced him to gliding spontaneously apologised for doing it and a suggestion that

Australian glider pilots need a Glider Pilots and Owners Association to protect them from the GFA and represent them politically, something the GFA is clearly incapable of doing while it is a CASA sycophant in order to fulfill its insane desire to be the SOLE controller of

all gliding in Australia. They are also appalled at the information they are required to sign off on that is held by the GFA as they have no confidence how this might be used by GFA or anyone else who demands it.

So if Matt Gage is right the GFA has cleverly manoeuvred itself into a situation where its members can be grounded because of incompetence or omissions by the GFA control group ("Leadership Group" seems to be inappropriate for what they do).

Maybe it is time that Australian gliding reconsidered its structure. Is the current setup actually achieving what was intended? Are costs really lower than simply taking your glider to a country maintenance organisation and having them do the annual inspection. Seems

easier if all GFA is going to do is mirror the CASA Maintenance regs.

Maybe we should have a glider endorsement on the RPL or PPL or higher license? Let CASA deal with 2500 individuals and 1200 gliders and motorless gliders instead of ONE organisation, which is meant to represent its members, being a convenient target for a

predatory bureaucracy.

Mike



Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784     overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784                :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to