Well, they *do* say that you should stick with your glider ...

On 16 May 2016 at 16:45, Simon Rammelt <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you use a hoist to get in to a glider what happens in an outlanding
> situation?
>
>
> Simon Rammelt
> 788 Cushnie Road
> Cushnie QLD
> Australia
>
> [email protected]
>
> On 9/05/2016 7:27 AM, Laurie Hoffman wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone know of any club using a disability hoist to assist with
> glider access.
>
> Regards
> Laurie Hoffman
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Peter Champness <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> *To:* Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 April 2016, 21:16
> *Subject:* Re: [Aus-soaring] The Golden Age
>
> James,
>
> No I did not understand what Emilis wrote.  But I am interested!
>
> Intervention by Government or DO GOODER PEOPLE is always bad in my
> philosophy.  It goes against the interests of the INDIVUAL which should be
> the highest principle.  That takes us into  high level philosophy.
>
> I hope that this will find some resonance with gliding people, who are
> very likely independent thinkers.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:57 PM, James McDowall <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Emilis,
> I understood what you wrote but did anyone else? After years of working in
> the building industry and experiencing first hand post bushfire bureaucracy
> I have come to the conclusion that "affordable housing" is a confusion in
> terms. The stringencies of the ABCB, however well intentioned are driving
> up building costs. There is a lesson here for all forms of recreational
> aviation.
> Jim
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:50 AM, emillis prelgauskas <
> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Gary,
> I fully concur that memory adds rose to the glasses.
>
> I am drilling a bit deeper, based on my fire ground and court work.
> In all fields of activity, there are prescriptive rules  and these are
> vehemently applied
> and defended by some.
> In many fields of activity it has since been demonstrated that ‘one size
> fits all’
> creates more problems than it solves.
> That doesn’t stop the ‘fixed rules’ crowd from trying to forget about
> alternate solutions.
>
> fire ground example: “No, you can’t build a new replacement home where
> your existing home was burnt
> down by the bushfire; because the rules have changed and we don’t permit
> that sort of thing now”.
>
> In these fields the primacy of good human outcomes results in ‘alternate
> solutions’ which can then be applied:
> “The new build will have a shelter to ABCB guidelines, fire resistant
> construction to AS3959 and siting
> maintenance/fire fighting capability to Minister’s Spec SA78 - i.e. this
> is permitted.”
>
> Gliding is still travelling down that path of recognising that better
> outcomes come from a baseline of
> prescriptive ‘deemed-to-satisfy’ provisions with higher order alternate
> solutions above this.
> (The Building Code of Australia categorises 3 such layers in its industry,
> with ‘expert judgement’
> at the top of the pyramid.)
>
> Emilis
>
>
> On 24 Apr 2016, at 9:11 pm, Gary Stevenson < <[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Emilis, on consideration, I do not entirely agree with your recent
> comments.
> > Golden ages live in our memories, but (fortunately/unfortunately),
> memories
> > are fallable. In any case, all that you refer has passed ..for ever.
> >
> > As always, NOW is the time to seize the moment
> >
> > Let me suggest to you and to everyone else who is a member of this forum,
> > that the reality of gliding in Australia today .... right now ...... is
> that
> > we are living in an era WHERE THIS IT IS AS GOOD AS IT IS EVER GOING TO
> GET.
> >
> > THIS is the golden age.
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing 
> [email protected]http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>


-- 
sudo apt-get install witty-mail-signature
cannot find package: witty-mail-signature
sudo apt-get install lame-mail-signature
installing ...

The main idea of "Inception": if you run a VM inside a VM inside a VM
inside a VM, everything will be very, very slow.
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to