>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:21:42 +0930 (CST)
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:    Non-member 
>submission from ["Jason Pigdon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]  
>X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViSperl10-milter (http://amavis.org/)
>
>  >From aus-soaring-owner  Fri Aug 24 20:21:42 2001
>Received: from dalek.ains.net.au (ains.net.au [210.9.53.3])
>       by lists.internode.on.net (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f7OApfM67994
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 
>20:21:41 +0930 (CST)
>       (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Received: from acecyber (cgw237.ains.net.au [210.9.53.237])
>       by dalek.ains.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA29575
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 
>20:51:39 +1000
>From: "Jason Pigdon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [aus-soaring] SFS4
>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:53:29 +1000
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>       charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
>Importance: Normal
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>Hi Ken,
>
>>
>>  I received my copy of the brand new, hot off the presses, SFS4
>>  from Germany
>>  yesterday and immediately installed it. Not surprisingly, it
>>  looks very nice
>>  but, unfortunately it seems my computer doesn't have the grunt power to do
>>  it justice. The system I installed it on is a pentium III 450, 192Mb RAM
>>  with a Diamond Viper V330 video card.
>>
>>  The instructions actually warns that there is a pretty high
>>  demand on either
>>  a gutsy 3D video card (of which the Diamond Viper isn't) or on the central
>>  processor which it recommends at a minimum of 700 MHz.
>>
>>  I was wondering if anyone else has it installed with whom I could compare
>>  notes regarding performance?
>
>My experience is not with SFS, but Microsofts Flight Simulator.
>Specifically  Versions 98 and 2000.   This step, like SFS brought huge new
>computing requirements.  At the time of 2000's release, systems that were
>top of the line were required.
>
>If SFS are recomending 700mhz, then go for at LEAST a 900.  RAM, you can
>never have too much of, best off in one chip.  At the moment, 256mb of ram
>is cheap, about $70 is the going rate.  For video, on a tight budget, you
>can't go past the VOODOO 3, but a GEOFORCE is even better.
>
>If upgrading, and don't want the expense of a genuine Intel, then go for the
>AMD Athlon/Thunderbird.  Forget the Duron, for gaming its way behind the P3
>or Thunderbird.
>
>Regards
>Jason Pigdon


-- 

---
Simon Hackett, Technical Director, Internode Systems Pty Ltd
31 York St [PO Box 284, Rundle Mall], Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Web: http://www.internode.on.net
Phone: +61-8-8223-2999          Fax: +61-8-8223-1777

--
  * You are subscribed to the aus-soaring mailing list.
  * To Unsubscribe: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  * with "unsubscribe aus-soaring" in the body of the message
  * or with "help" in the body of the message for more information.

Reply via email to