Quoting Mike Borgelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Do I detect a faint hint of ongoing unhappiness with the magazine and
> its "perpetrators"?

Here comes the sigh from the list members again ... "oh no, more magazine 
bashing !"

I can understand the sentiment of Mike's comment though - I also seem to recall 
that a canopy (Arrow ?) from Benalla had likewise been sold some time ago yet 
still appears each month in the GFA Classifieds along with the aforementioned 
Hornet.

A few of my pet peeves:

There has been a recent series of articles to do with electrics and radio on 
trikes.  WHY, oh WHY can't the editor and sub-editors at least agree that maybe 
we we use radios and electrics too ?  These articles have a GENERAL interest, 
not just for the trike pilots, yet they (and even the writers to some extent) 
seem to like to stick their heads in the sand and pretend they're targeting one 
audience i.e. the one that concerns THEIR discipline.  With some small 
editorial changes they would be relevant to more disciplines (with appropriate 
icons at the page top) e.g. trikes with radios are like gliders (with radios !) 
and motor gliders (with both motor and radio) and maybe even paramotors (I 
presume these have radios fitted ?)

If the powers that be can't even amalgamate the magazine, then what hope did 
they really have of amalgamating GFA with HGFA ?

I am also finding the "advertorials" a bit tedious.  I mean, we all know that 
Bernhard Eckey is the ASH/ASW agent in Australia, but do we need to have cover 
photos, centerfolds and test flight reports each month ?  Mike - maybe you 
should write a B2000 article, complete with sexy centrefold shots of it and 
then you wouldn't have to worry about paying for advertising ! LOL

On the plus side, it was good to see an article on the Gloucester ridge camp - 
just a bunch of ordinary club members from the grass roots of the GFA 
membership having a great time.  There should be more of this.  And also Cath 
Conway's article on her son's experiences in a glider.  That's got me head down 
writing an article about my experiences, and those of my 3rd generation gliding 
5 year old son.  Watch AG in the new year !!!

> Don't forget these same people occasionally interface with the
> government and claim to represent you.
> 
> Pity they haven't faced an election.
> 
> Slightly related, has the GFA annual meeting been held?

Yes
 
> Did anything happen?

For one, the Autotug finally got killed off.

See the November AG/Skysailor (just arrived a few days ago), where a whole 
double page was devoted to names and addresses (physical and e-mail) of those 
elected for the next year - in some ways it probably could have been covered 
better on the web site (and I note that the ever efficient GFA webmaster David 
Head has done just that - THANKS DAVID !).  With the exception of those with e-
mail only accounts like Telstra Easymail, 99.9% of those with e-mail have web 
access too, and if you want their e-mail addresses, you are far more likely to 
look on the GFA web site than digging around for the Nov 2001 AG/SS.

The AGM and ACM Minutes appear on the GFA web site, along with my 
favourite "missing minute matters", for example

WHO moved each item ?  WHO seconded each item ?

Where can "Joe Average" get a copy of all the reports which were submitted and 
accepted by the AGM and ACM ?

Why aren't the reports and presentations always given to the webmaster for 
inclusion as part of the GFA web site ?  Surely in 2001, EVERYONE can submit an 
electronic version of their report. I for one would LOVE to see the Development 
Officer's presentation as development and growth of our Club is a key issue 
that interests our Committee.

Could we PLEASE (at Club and State level) encourage better Minute keeping at 
these meetings and more transparency through readily available reports and 
presentations on the GFA web site ?

A member kept in the dark is a cynical member - give us a bit of transparency, 
and thus a chance to know about and participate in the process and we're more 
likely to give you our trust.

> Does anyone care?

I do - see above.  I'd like to think that my $157.30 each year gets put to more 
use than just the magazine, and that I have some say in how that money is used.

Regards

Jason Armistead

--
  * You are subscribed to the aus-soaring mailing list.
  * To Unsubscribe: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  * with "unsubscribe aus-soaring" in the body of the message
  * or with "help" in the body of the message for more information.

Reply via email to