|
There was only one responce today to the RPL question. So the
vote stands at 7no, and 29 yes, for a RPL. In view of the tailing off in votes I
will leave it at that for now. Work the percentages out how you like, but there
are obviously more pilots prepared to accept a RPL than there are not to accept
a RPL.
My own gliding days are over, but I still retain an interest
in the world of gliding. Were I still an active pilot I would be inclined to
vote for a RPL. This is based on my having flown in America and Canada in recent
years. In both those countries you are required to have a license. Pilots in
countries where you are required to have a license cope with their systems, so
why shouldn't we? I still have my American license which indicates I am a
Private Pilot, Glider. I didn't have any great problems getting it! and they
were quite happy for me to glide anywhere, any time, in the good old USA.
Cheers, Ron Baker. PS I didn't have to have a medical in either the USA or
Canada.
|
- Re: [aus-soaring] RPL results Peter Rundle
- Re: [aus-soaring] RPL results Peter Stephenson
- RE: [aus-soaring] RPL results David Conway
- Re: [aus-soaring] RPL results Peter Rundle
- RE: [aus-soaring] RPL results David Conway
- Re: [aus-soaring] RPL results Dav
- [aus-soaring] RPL results Ronald E Baker
- RE: [aus-soaring] RPL results Stuart & Kerri Ferguson
- Re: [aus-soaring] RPL results Graeme Cant
- Re: [aus-soaring] RPL results Mike Borgelt
- RE: [aus-soaring] RPL results Ronald E Baker
- RE: [aus-soaring] RPL results Graeme Cant
- RE: [aus-soaring] RPL results David Conway
- Redbacks (was: Re: [aus-soaring] RPL ... Mark Newton
