John,

 > So as the burden of club
> obligations interferes with my enjoyment of a sport I love, I find I am
> casting about looking for alternatives to Gliding Club operations to enjoy
> the thrill of flying.

You've put your finger on what I see as a problem (challange?) facing 
gliding
clubs. After a while, running ropes and driving winches just becomes 
like hard
labour. Especially when much of that labour is being given to students 
of whom
a large proportion will not continue on in the sport. As clubs generally 
try
to keep fees as low as possible to encourage new blood, the end result 
of all
this activity is little or no financial benefit to the club, little or 
no new
blood and a burnt out longer term membership. Clubs need to identify those
individuals that are in if for the long term and eliminate the "got the 
t-shirt"
brigade.

How? Buggered if I know, but here are some ideas. And for those critics 
in the
wings, please remember that I'm not suggesting that all clubs should 
adopt these
ideas, but that some clubs might be able to make a go of it, where they are
currently failing. Also, whilst my rantings on this list might lead many to
believe that I'm "anti-club" that is not in fact true. Clubs need to exist
because (most) individuals simply can't afford to run their own 
airfield, and to
a lesser extent, their own aircraft. However, the politics that 
invariably comes
with the club scene becomes destructive, and in todays recreational market,
where individual freedom rates highly, clubs are a major problem for 
aviation
and gliding in particular because it relies on clubs the most.

. Initial training in motor gliders allows the student to get lots of 
circuits
and aerial work without the need for anyone else on the field (except the
instructor of course). The instructor can also focus on the student, and 
flight
bookings are practical so that todays time harried recreator can 
realistically
fit in some flying without being charged with family neglect. Downsides, 
cost,
motor gliders are either new and expensive or old and rare. Possibility 
of the
motor glider as the club tug on Sundays might help. Alternatively some 
training
could be conducted in Ulight's, same benefits as a motorglider but 
possibly less
expensive capital purchase. A common licencing system would help in this 
regard.
Student might be put off by the engine bit, after all they wanted to 
take up
gliding, but then others who enjoy all types of flying could see it as a 
bonus.
The hourly rate might seem higher, but two half hour flights with 
aero-tows,
2 x $25 + $45/hr = $95. In the motor glider you'd get a whole lot more 
circuits
in your hour and end up paying around the same amount with no pushing of 
gliders
running of ropes, obligation to stay and help the next student.

. Clubs have non-student days. Means that all the students turn up on 
their day
and thus they run ropes etc for the other students when not flying, 
rather than
one or two students turning up each flying day. Those that enjoy 
teaching have
their time in the sun on those days leaving the solo pilots to have 
their day
as well. Again, a licence/rating that allowed for operation without L2 
instructor
would make it a lot easier for a club to do this.

. Clubs that don't train at all. At the moment, the GFA system means 
each and
every club is required to have a training operation. The end result is 
that only
the larger clubs have good training resources, the smaller clubs are 
stretched
to provide the necessary equipment and personel, and it's central place 
in the
club operation is off putting to qualified pilots. If clubs (and I'm 
thinking
smaller clubs in particular) could operate without a training system, 
and send
their students to other clubs/schools to be trained, then they might be 
able to
focus on providing quality gliding hours to solo pilots, whilst the 
training
club/schools might be more economically viable because of the increase in
students (as a result of the student population not being stretched 
across 90
clubs in Aus). Also the increased viability of the schools means that 
pilots
that belong to non-training clubs have somewhere to go to get checks done.
A single check flight might be pricing event for these pilots but it's a 
once
a year. Again requires a licencing system that allows a club to exist 
*without*
an instructors panel.

rgds

Pete










--
  * You are subscribed to the aus-soaring mailing list.
  * To Unsubscribe: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  * with "unsubscribe aus-soaring" in the body of the message
  * or with "help" in the body of the message for more information.

Reply via email to