As an answer for that question. Basically yes. Mechanical type failures are _almost_ non existant .
I have heard figures bandied around of aircraft failure accidents about 2% of total, but effectively this is bugger all. The reality is, most (virtually all) accidents are caused by the pilots actions.
Note that for powered aircraft (GA types anyway, to be comparable to gliders) the pattern is very similar, if slightly muddied by engine failures.
 
The more interesting question is, before seeing this result, what did you (and other pilots) think (feel) the rate would be? and why?
 
Not a dig, a real question from someone interested in your (and others) perceptions.
 
Regards
SWK


From: Geoff Kidd
 
 
(2)    Am I correct in the reading of these reports of occurrences between 13 Nov 2004 & 19 Nov 2005 that, perhaps with the exception of the "Canopy opening in flight" incident(s) that none of our Accidents or Incidents was due to a structural of other failure of an aircraft?
 
 
**********************************************************************
This email and any file attachments are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please tell us immediately
by return email and delete the document.
The information in this email expresses the opinion of the author
and does not necessarily represent the views of ETSA Utilities.
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to