At 06:20 PM 22/01/2007, you wrote:
Thanks John

So I am assuming the problem only occurs due to incorrect assembly and not during operation after a correct assembly.

Paul



Yes, nothing wrong with it after assembly except it may be working backwards.

However the one I saw in NZ obviously had the aileron differential wrong which was fairly obvious to me as a result of the drives being reversed during maintenance.

The design lesson is that it would have been possible to design the glider so that the skew drives were identical or failing that that the rod that went in to the aileron was of different diameters for each side so that it wouldn't fit on one side if it was the wrong one. Hard to catch all the possibilities of course.

The operational lesson was that the procedures were in place to catch the problem in 3 places. The bloke doing the annual should have measured the control deflections, the guy who rigged the glider should have done a check after connecting the controls and the test pilot should have noticed the wrong sense of the controls before stepping in to the cockpit. In the first case I mentioned they were in fact 3 different people at 3 different times.

Pretty obviously the procedures were in place.

Question is why weren't they followed and would more onerous or complex procedures have any different outcome?

Mike


Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
          Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to