I think common sense should be applied.  

In unobscured air with good visibility the alarm going off
just serves to keep your eyes open and a glance at the Flarm
to ensure that no-one is in your blind spots.  See and avoid
should work quite well in these situations.

In the situation with poor visibility and a warning of a
head on collision, then why can't the glider with the head
on-collision warning break to their right (with the
exception being a poor visibilty ridge flight)?  In the
situation where both aircraft are approaching head on,
collision is avoided. In the instance of a glider overtaking
another from behind, the collsion is avoided (the glider
with the rear collision warning takes no action).





> I see a potential problem in a busy gaggle at a comp where
> the Flarm can be  going off almost all the time.  I love
> it as a safety device in these  circumstances, but if I
> had to avoid every warning I couldn't see I could  never
> be in the thermal in the first place!
> 
> Tom
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richard Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in
> Australia."  <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 3:59 PM
> Subject: [Aus-soaring] Rules for using Flarm
> 
> 
> > There has been some recent discussion over a glass of
> > Red on how we should be using our Flarms.
> >
> > As glider pilots have been trained to lookout and when
> > they see a threat then they take avoiding action.
> >
> > We have been told of an incident when two gliders were
> > in a head on collision situation as warned by the Flarm,
> > they were in a near cloud base situation and openly
> > confess to not taking avoidance action until they
> actually saw one another. That action resulted in a save
> > but it was very close.
> >
> > I would like to see some debate on setting rules on how
> > we use Flarm. Do  we
> > say the rule is that we use it to help spot other
> > gliders (the old see and avoid model) or do we get
> > ourselves trained into automatically taking avoidance
> action even before we spot the other glider? >
> > If there is a consensus that we use the latter then how
> is it implemented. >
> > Richard Robinson
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aus-soaring mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To check or change subscription details, visit:
> >
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> > >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.2/1388 -
> > Release Date:  20/04/2008 3:01 PM
> >
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to