Hi All,

Mike wrote


> > > 137.120 Documents to be carried on a flight
> > > (1) The pilot in command of an aeroplane being used for an 
> > application operation must have a copy of the aeroplane's flight 
> > manual, or an approved alternative document, on board the aeroplane 
> > on every flight.
> > > Penalty: 10 penalty units.
> > > (2) The pilot must also have the documents or copies mentioned in 
> > subregulations (4) and (5) on board the aeroplane on a flight if 
> > the aeroplane will be more than 1 hour's flying time (at cruise 
> > speed in still air) from the operator's principal operating base.
> > > Penalty: 10 penalty units.
> >
> >And I thought the aviation weather bulletins were almost incomprehensible!
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Dave L
> 
> Hi Dave
> 
> Apart from the fact that Michael Texler did not quote any reference 
> to CASR Part 137, Part 137 is for Aerial Application operations. 
> That's aerial agriculture and fire-fighting to you and me! It is 
> totally irrelevant to glider towing! Further, the PA-25 Pawnee does 
> not require a flight manual, as Michael correctly quoted from the 
> non-required list. [However, it does require a supplement for the 
> aerial agriculture and fire-fighting roles, as it does for the glider 
> towing role - BUT ONLY THE ROLE SUPPLEMENT.]
> 
> If you had a Glider Towing Supplement for your pre-2001 (unique 
> Australian style) flight manual, this is sufficient for a glider 
> towing supplement under the present rules - but you DO need to 
> identify it by attaching a copy to an approval page and getting a 
> CASA signature on the approval page. And under the former (an

> present) Government's policies for charging individuals for such 
> services, you may end up incurring a bill for this.
> 
> Wombat
> 
> If you don't understand quantum physics, don't post references about 
> it to prove you don't.
> 
> Wombat 

Thanks for *clearing up the confusion* (Laughs hysterically) Mike. By the way I 
do not fly power.

That "Whoooshing sound" you heard when you read my post,  was the sound of my 
attempt at humour passing over your head(-:

So to keep it clear. <Joke alert>

Dont know what you thought I meant , but I was simply reflecting on the 
incredibly complicated language
used in the regulations.

 I sometimes wonder if CASA employ a special department to make it so difficult 
to understand!  Obsufication section perhaps?

One (fictional) day at CASA HQ;

"Damn it, Algernon, I understand these new regs, send it off to the 
Obsufication section quick-and tell them not to send it back until no-one but 
CASA can understand it"(-:

Got to live up to the CASA motto,

"Were not happy till your not happy!" )-:

Regards

Dave



_________________________________________________________________
Be part of history. Take part in Australia's first e-mail archive with Email 
Australia.
http://emailaustralia.ninemsn.com.au
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to