...might be another feather in the bow of those supporting the mandatory use
of Transponders - the comp organisers would be able to track all gliders
around each turn point.....



On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:44 PM, <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Send Aus-soaring mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Aus-soaring digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Forgery and sabotage (Mark Newton)
>   2. Re: Forgery and sabotage (Mike Borgelt)
>   3. Re: Forgery and sabotage (Tim Shirley)
>   4. Re: Forgery and sabotage (Mark Newton)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:59:30 +1030
> From: Mark Newton <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Aus-soaring] Forgery and sabotage
> To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Amazing the kind of stuff that's available off-the-shelf these days.
>
> I reckon if you put one of these and a IGC-approved logger into a
> barometric chamber, you can create the world record datalogger trace
> of your choice:
> http://labsat.co.uk/
>
> The labsat unit takes a GPS or GNSS datafile and plays it back as RF,
> so a nearby GPS device will actually believe that it has followed the
> course described by the trace.  With a barometric chamber you get the
> pressure altitude axis as well.  The result will be a datafile you
> can extract from your IGC-approved logger which says pretty much
> whatever you want it to say.
>
> It costs about UKP7000, so you might want to buy into one in a
> syndicate with other like-minded cheats.  "Tell you what, I'll
> claim the distance record, why don't you claim the speed-around-
> a-300km-triangle record?"
>
> Meanwhile, there're also ways of preventing other people from getting
> logger traces.  For about twenty bucks you can get one of these:
> http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.35827
> Couple it with a 12V power source and hide it in the tiedown kit bag
> in whichever aircraft is at the top of a competition leaderboard to
> produce a "I would have won that comp if it weren't for that goddamn
> GPS malfunction!" result.  Maybe you're not even competing in the
> comp, you just want to stir trouble 'cos you're taking the piss.
>
> It comes with free delivery :-)
>
> The equipment required to both forge and sabotage GPS traces is
> readily available off-the-shelf at prices that individuals can afford.
>
> For how long will GPS continue to be trusted for world record and
> competition claims?  Will we get back to using barographs and cameras?
> Are the requirements on official observers good enough to protect against
> forgery?
>
> I love the 21st century :-)
>
>  - mark
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> I tried an internal modem,                    [email protected]
>     but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
> ----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 -----
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:25:37 +1000
> From: Mike Borgelt <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Forgery and sabotage
> To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Mark,
>
> That sort of stuff has been available for a long time, just cheaper
> and even more ubiquitous now.
>
> About 12 years ago a guy claimed on r.a.s. that he had done this. He
> knew some guys in military electronics in the US. He thought the IGC
> security requirements were ludicrous because of this gaping hole in
> the security.
>
> You probably don't need to buy one, just know somebody who works at a
> small company that has one and that he can take home on the weekend.
>
> This was all discussed extensively when the IGC decided to adopt GNSS
> loggers and they even made a rule "It is prohibited to feed data into
> the device via the antenna".
>
> Makes all the rest of the security song and dance look pretty silly.
> As ever, security comes down to people  - in this case the O.O.s. If
> the O.O. is present at the beginning and end of flight and scutineers
> the glider you'll get reasonable security. The IGC decided they
> couldn't trust the O.O. so tried to build the security into the
> hardware. Epic fail.
>
> If you own an IGC flight recorder just think of all the money you
> were forced to spend for non existent security.
>
> Come to think of it, a device  like this would be great for AATs. Fly
> the task and record the GPS position and move it a little further
> each fix until you've flown a greater distance. Feed that through the
> device and into the FR in near real time.
>
>
> Mike
>
> At 12:29 PM 20/01/2011, you wrote:
> >Amazing the kind of stuff that's available off-the-shelf these days.
> >
> >I reckon if you put one of these and a IGC-approved logger into a
> >barometric chamber, you can create the world record datalogger trace
> >of your choice:
> >http://labsat.co.uk/
> >
> >The labsat unit takes a GPS or GNSS datafile and plays it back as RF,
> >so a nearby GPS device will actually believe that it has followed the
> >course described by the trace.  With a barometric chamber you get the
> >pressure altitude axis as well.  The result will be a datafile you
> >can extract from your IGC-approved logger which says pretty much
> >whatever you want it to say.
> >
> >It costs about UKP7000, so you might want to buy into one in a
> >syndicate with other like-minded cheats.  "Tell you what, I'll
> >claim the distance record, why don't you claim the speed-around-
> >a-300km-triangle record?"
> >
> >Meanwhile, there're also ways of preventing other people from getting
> >logger traces.  For about twenty bucks you can get one of these:
> >http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.35827
> >Couple it with a 12V power source and hide it in the tiedown kit bag
> >in whichever aircraft is at the top of a competition leaderboard to
> >produce a "I would have won that comp if it weren't for that goddamn
> >GPS malfunction!" result.  Maybe you're not even competing in the
> >comp, you just want to stir trouble 'cos you're taking the piss.
> >
> >It comes with free delivery :-)
> >
> >The equipment required to both forge and sabotage GPS traces is
> >readily available off-the-shelf at prices that individuals can afford.
> >
> >For how long will GPS continue to be trusted for world record and
> >competition claims?  Will we get back to using barographs and cameras?
> >Are the requirements on official observers good enough to protect against
> >forgery?
> >
> >I love the 21st century :-)
> >
> >   - mark
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >I tried an internal modem,                    [email protected]
> >      but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
> >----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 -----
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Aus-soaring mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >To check or change subscription details, visit:
> >http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
> Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments since
> 1978
> phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
> fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
> cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
>
> email:   [email protected]
> website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:04:05 +1100
> From: "Tim Shirley" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Forgery and sabotage
> To: "'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.'"
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> As Mike says, the artificial generation of GPS signals has always been
> possible, as have several other possible methods of cheating.  It?s a bit
> of
> a yawn, really.
>
>
>
> Anyone who wants to come to one of my competitions and try it on is
> welcome.
> I predict they will be shown the gate in about 2 days, and will never fly a
> glider in a competition again.  It will be definitely more fun to just fly
> the task.
>
>
>
> And no (before you ask), I am not going to tell you how I will know.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> tra dire e fare c`? mezzo il mare
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike
> Borgelt
> Sent: Thursday, 20 January 2011 14:26
> To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Forgery and sabotage
>
>
>
> Mark,
>
> That sort of stuff has been available for a long time, just cheaper
> and even more ubiquitous now.
>
> About 12 years ago a guy claimed on r.a.s. that he had done this. He
> knew some guys in military electronics in the US. He thought the IGC
> security requirements were ludicrous because of this gaping hole in
> the security.
>
> You probably don't need to buy one, just know somebody who works at a
> small company that has one and that he can take home on the weekend.
>
> This was all discussed extensively when the IGC decided to adopt GNSS
> loggers and they even made a rule "It is prohibited to feed data into
> the device via the antenna".
>
> Makes all the rest of the security song and dance look pretty silly.
> As ever, security comes down to people  - in this case the O.O.s. If
> the O.O. is present at the beginning and end of flight and scutineers
> the glider you'll get reasonable security. The IGC decided they
> couldn't trust the O.O. so tried to build the security into the
> hardware. Epic fail.
>
> If you own an IGC flight recorder just think of all the money you
> were forced to spend for non existent security.
>
> Come to think of it, a device  like this would be great for AATs. Fly
> the task and record the GPS position and move it a little further
> each fix until you've flown a greater distance. Feed that through the
> device and into the FR in near real time.
>
>
> Mike
>
> At 12:29 PM 20/01/2011, you wrote:
> >Amazing the kind of stuff that's available off-the-shelf these days.
> >
> >I reckon if you put one of these and a IGC-approved logger into a
> >barometric chamber, you can create the world record datalogger trace
> >of your choice:
> >http://labsat.co.uk/
> >
> >The labsat unit takes a GPS or GNSS datafile and plays it back as RF,
> >so a nearby GPS device will actually believe that it has followed the
> >course described by the trace.  With a barometric chamber you get the
> >pressure altitude axis as well.  The result will be a datafile you
> >can extract from your IGC-approved logger which says pretty much
> >whatever you want it to say.
> >
> >It costs about UKP7000, so you might want to buy into one in a
> >syndicate with other like-minded cheats.  "Tell you what, I'll
> >claim the distance record, why don't you claim the speed-around-
> >a-300km-triangle record?"
> >
> >Meanwhile, there're also ways of preventing other people from getting
> >logger traces.  For about twenty bucks you can get one of these:
> >http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.35827
> >Couple it with a 12V power source and hide it in the tiedown kit bag
> >in whichever aircraft is at the top of a competition leaderboard to
> >produce a "I would have won that comp if it weren't for that goddamn
> >GPS malfunction!" result.  Maybe you're not even competing in the
> >comp, you just want to stir trouble 'cos you're taking the piss.
> >
> >It comes with free delivery :-)
> >
> >The equipment required to both forge and sabotage GPS traces is
> >readily available off-the-shelf at prices that individuals can afford.
> >
> >For how long will GPS continue to be trusted for world record and
> >competition claims?  Will we get back to using barographs and cameras?
> >Are the requirements on official observers good enough to protect against
> >forgery?
> >
> >I love the 21st century :-)
> >
> >   - mark
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >I tried an internal modem,                    [email protected]
> >      but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
> >----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 -----
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Aus-soaring mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >To check or change subscription details, visit:
> >http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
> Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments since
> 1978
> phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
> fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
> cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
>
> email:   [email protected]
> website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>  _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3390 - Release Date: 01/19/11
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/private/aus-soaring/attachments/20110120/933cf7c0/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:14:17 +1030
> From: Mark Newton <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Forgery and sabotage
> To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> On 20/01/2011, at 1:55 PM, Mike Borgelt wrote:
>
> > That sort of stuff has been available for a long time, just cheaper and
> even more ubiquitous now.
>
> Yeah, that was kinda my point:  The cheapness and ubiquity makes a
> material difference, given that security is all about the costs of
> tradeoffs.
>
> It's always been /possible/ to gain the FAI OO system, but until
> recently it's probably been "cheaper" (dollars, effort) to game it
> by non-technological means.
>
> These days that's probably no longer the case:  it's approaching the
> time when it's easier and cheaper to cheat with a computer.
>
>  - mark
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> I tried an internal modem,                    [email protected]
>     but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
> ----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 -----
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
> End of Aus-soaring Digest, Vol 88, Issue 29
> *******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to