On 22 February 2010 07:39, Stuart Kinnear <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting how nuclear was the bad boy in my generation and now the
> saviour of the world. I wonder if Mr Gates is prepared to live or work next
> to one of these new generation reactors, or event better near the mines and
> processing, disposal facilities.
>

No one would ever live next to one ever. A better question is "Would you
prefer to live next to a coal fired plant or a nuclear one?"


> I don't think for a minute that zero carbon is going to make the slightest
> bit of difference. Implementing proper land management will, as our natural
> carbon dioxide absorbers could be reinstated,  but that is not 'magic'
> enough and does not line the very rich pockets of the very few. Reducing
> emissions helps in a lot of ways more so that the carbon dioxide problem,
> but the destruction of our habitats is by far the biggest worry at present.
>

Quite right. I'd actually argue that cr4p government in most of the
developing world is a cause of such problems - not a carbon debt. Buy
anyway... hey! Is it Friday already? It feels like Monday!

-- 
David Connors ([email protected])
Software Engineer
Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com
Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417
189 363
V-Card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
Address Info: https://www.codify.com/contact

Reply via email to