> Check out the UEA mail leaks as it does not sound like you have. It is > really eye popping reading. Conspiracy to delete data, fudge data and > models, ensuring the deletion of mail at Hadley and uPen on impending > assessment report findings, constant withholding of data and source code > preventing independent verification of findings, conspiring to illegally > block perfectly valid freedom of information requests - it is all there if > you want to have a long read. These are not bit players on the fringe - > we're talking about the core "team" - Jones, Mann, Briffa, Trenberth, > Schmidt, et al.
If you take 10 years of emails and correspondence between people in an organisation and pick out a few little bits here and there you can pretty much come up any conclusion you want about someone. The email leaks were meaningless unless you have read ALL of it and been across ALL of their research and correspondence. For example, your email above says "ensuring the deletion of mail". I can take this to mean you are trying to cover up some nefarious deed by telling people you are emailing around "ensuring the deletion of mail". Of course not, because I have totally take it out of context, just like the emails from the scientists above. Craig Craig.
