Do we have, or do we want to have, a general OT list?  There must be some
ppl losing patience with some of these threads.

On 24 February 2010 15:27, mike smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> I mean, its failures are not necessarily the fault of the nuclear plants
> themselves.....
>
>
> On 24 February 2010 15:25, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> yep, exactly. So don't follow Spain then!
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 24th, 2010 at 3:24 PM, mike smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Spain isn't a poster child for good economy.
>> >
>> > On 24 February 2010 14:24, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Nuclear plant in Finland 3-5billion over budget
>> > > Siemens Areva Finish govt in law suit love triangle
>> > > Areva just bought Multibird wind turbines and Ausra solar thermal
>> > > so they're so sure of Nuclear that they're diversiftying into
>> > renewables
>> > > Spain's SENER built the successful nukes in spain -- has now
>> > stopped and is
>> > > building molten salt
>> > > power tower solar thermal plants 24 hour baseload solar plants
>> > > and when they built the nukes they didn't want to own them
>> > > As for some other nuke plants in Spain that failed to get
>> > commissioned
>> > > Spain lost 6 billion euro's
>> > > on these.
>> > > 6 billion euro's -- no power out the other end -- economic
>> > modelling not
>> > > required
>> > >
>> > > bad investment
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 24th, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Paul Gaske <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:37 AM, mike smith
>> > <[email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On 23 February 2010 21:29, Tony Wright <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>  And you don’t need to go nuclear. Nuclear as it currently
>> > > > stands is just
>> > > > >> a disgraceful option. The radioactive waste in current
>> > nuclear
>> > > > reactors with
>> > > > >> current technology takes 10,000 years to break down.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > That would be excluding IFR reactors?  Why exclude the best
>> > > > technology when
>> > > > > you quote figures?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor
>> > > > >
>> > > > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor>
>> > > > >  Even more comprehensive are systems such as the Integral Fast
>> > > > Reactor<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Fast_Reactor>
>> > (IFR)
>> > > > > pyroprocessing system, which uses pools of molten
>> > > > cadmium<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium> and
>> > > > > electrorefiners to reprocess metallic fuel directly on-site at
>> > the
>> > > > reactor.
>> > > > > [9] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor#cite_note-8>
>> > > > Such
>> > > > > systems not only commingle all the minor actinides with both
>> > > > uranium and
>> > > > > plutonium, they are compact and self-contained, so that no
>> > > > > plutonium-containing material ever needs to be transported
>> > away
>> > > > from the
>> > > > > site of the breeder reactor.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > Just to add to the nuclear option; thorium reactors producing 3%
>> > of
>> > > > the
>> > > > waste of a traditional nuclear reactor.  Additionally, the waste
>> > > > produced
>> > > > has a half-life of 500 years.
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.abc.net.au/quantum/scripts98/9820/rundown.htm#thorium
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Paul Gaske ([email protected])
>> > > > Software Engineer
>> > > > Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com
>> > > > Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile:
>> > +61
>> > > > 417
>> > > > 791 916
>> > > > Address Info: http://www.codify.com/AboutUs/ContactDetails
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Meski
>> >
>> > "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure,
>> > you'll
>> > get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Meski
>
> "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure,
> you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
>



-- 
Meski

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll
get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills

Reply via email to