On 26 February 2010 12:24, noonie <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah... > > _That_ already exists. It's called Google wave. > > <https://wave.google.com/wave/> > > Speaking of google wave, I have invites. Anyone?
> -- > noonie > > > On 26 February 2010 12:00, Jonathan Parker > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> What is needed is a replacement of email. A format that allows editing and >> versioning built into the email client. >> Then you can say. Ahh. Jim changed this line of the email on this date and >> then Jane changed it again a week later. >> It will save millions of dollars in bandwidth costs too. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Greg Harris < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sounds like SSW rules to better email >>> http://sharepoint.ssw.com.au/Standards/Communication/RulesToBetterEmail/Pages/SendTasksOneEmailAtATime.aspx >>> But you can not make a 100% rule it depends on the work style of the >>> person you are sending the email to. >>> If there is more than two items, start with... >>> Hi Fred, >>> There are two things I need from you >>> - X >>> - Y >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Meski "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
