Careful how you go there Paul. Dutton made the following statement to the House 20th September 2018.
"The government has consulted extensively with industry and the public on these measures and has made amendments to reflect the feedback in the legislation now before the parliament." I suggest saving comments as to the veracity of the extensive consultation process to what can be expressed within submissions to the PJCIS, which (as long as you don't publish anywhere else) are subject to Parliamentary privilege. Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 18:22, Paul Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > PJCIS has confirmed extra public consultation days have been scheduled - > webpage now says " An initial Public Hearing is expected to be held on > Friday, 19 October 2018. Further Public Hearings will be scheduled for > late October or early November 2018." > > Contact suggests at least one extra, possibly two extra hearings. > > Also, PJCIS is publishing submissions immediately as they arrive - see > https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018/Submissions > > Currently 17 submissions published by PJCIS. > > See > https://internet.org.au/news/210-open-letter-regarding-the-assistance-and-access-bill-2018 > for the Open Letter we sent to Minister Dutton yesterday calling for much > wider consultation, picking up material from several submissions that Home > Affairs haven't seen fit to publish yet. it got a bit of media attention > this morning. > > I'll be speaking about this on the final session of CommsDay Melbourne > tomorrow, if anyone onlist is attending CommsDay > > Paul (for Internet Australia) > > > > On 9/10/2018 12:52 PM, Paul Wilkins wrote: > > A reminder submissions close this Friday 12:00pm. > > Also, I've had a look for the Digital Industry Group's submission > (includes Google and other industry heavyweights) and can't find it. More > to the point (*sigh*) Dep't Home Affairs haven't published it. Does anyone > have a link please? > > Obviously Home Affairs (who've published only 100 out of 700 legitimate > submissions) appear to be deliberately stymying public debate. > > Am really curious how this is going to get through the PJCIS process. If > the Liberals do as they're told, then the Bill has wider support than just > Dutton's Office. But it will be very interesting to see where Labor draws > its policy direction from. The reach of police powers envisaged in the Bill > will find strong resistance in Labor ranks. > > Kind regards > > Paul Wilkins > > > On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 at 19:34, Christian Heinrich < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Paul, >> >> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 10:32 AM Paul Wilkins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > They are conducting public consultation. Submissions should be received >> by 12:00pm Friday 12 October 2018. >> >> >> https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-encryption-exclusive/exclusive-in-test-case-u-s-fails-to-force-facebook-to-wiretap-messenger-calls-sources-idUSKCN1M82K1 >> >> There is also a NewsCorp article entitled "Would-be foreign fighter >> sent back to Oz" >> >> https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Would-be+foreign+fighter+sent+back+to+Oz%22 >> which is behind a paywall but the jist is that his phone was searched >> prior to departing Australia with nothing incriminating found [on his >> phone] if I remember correctly. >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Christian Heinrich >> >> http://cmlh.id.au/contact >> https://my.fullcontact.com/profile/cmlh.id.au >> > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing > [email protected]http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
