*"In practice, if they balls-up the change request given to the device manufacturer or app/website developer, anything could happen."*
Then you recall the obligation under the Telecommunications Act 1997 for carriers to "do their best to protect networks and facilities". No such obligation attaches to the Crown under the powers of the Assistance and Access Bill 2018. So, even if in the cases of misfeasance, non feasance, or malfeasance on the part of the Crown or its agents in the implementation of TCNs/TANs/TARs, and their impact on carriers businesses, liability rests, not with the Crown as you might ingenuously assume, but with the carrier who unwittingly acted as directed. Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 06:38, Scott Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ----------------------- > ...the drafting certainly seems loose enough for a future > government to establishthe machinery of a police state. > ----------------------- > > I'm seeing this in *NOG lists and elsewhere all over the > world. It's going to be an interesting next buncha years! > > scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
