Just stumbled on this in RSS https://www.zdnet.com/article/everyone-will-use-encryption-australia-should-get-over-it-un-special-rapporteur/
Kindly, ROY ADAMS* | *P 07 3040 5010 | Web: http://www.racs.com.au/ | Wiki: https://ex.racs.com.au:444/ | eMail: mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> Please never upgrade to the latest Windows 10 - You don’t need the hassle, and I don’t need the work. If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur - Red Adair. Life is a journey through a series of adventures.. Live them, love them, hate them, but never give up on your dreams, desires, and goals. On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 12:20, Serge Malev <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/650034/compromise-could-see-quick-passage-for-parts-of-encryption-bill/ > > ... > > report could hypothetically support conferring the powers outlined in the > bill on agencies conducting counter-terrorism operations, such as ASIO, > while other agencies, such as a number of anti-corruption bodies, would not > receive new powers. > > Dreyfus raised as an option “interim processing of part of the bill in > order that the government’s stated purpose of urgency can be served while > the committee continues to consider the remainder of the bill and tries to > deal with the multitude of concerns that have been expressed”. > > <https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/650034/compromise-could-see-quick-passage-for-parts-of-encryption-bill/> > Compromise could see quick passage for parts of encryption bill - > Computerworld > <https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/650034/compromise-could-see-quick-passage-for-parts-of-encryption-bill/> > The government has continued to increase pressure on the Parliamentary > Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) to hand down a quick > verdict on the bill, which is intended to undermine the use of encryption > by criminal groups. > www.computerworld.com.au > > ------------------------------ > *From:* AusNOG <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul > Wilkins <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 27, 2018 12:49 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Assistance and Access Bill moves to PJCIS > > As they say, a week is a long time in politics. > > PJCIS is holding a Top Secret briefing with ASIO as to whether they need > to expedite the Bill, but in context, it's not like rising use of > encryption is news to anyone. The sudden urgency to pass the Bill at this > late stage has every appearance of interference with PJCIS doing its job. > > With Julia Banks' announcement she will move to the crossbenches, I will > take plenty of 6 to 4 against Dutton (MP?) getting his way and passing the > Assistance and Access Bill before Christmas. > > Kind regards > > Paul Wilkins > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:52, Michelle Sullivan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Paul Wilkins wrote: > > If Dutton is in fact ineligible to sit, then so too is his motion to > > introduce the Bill to Parliament. Or such is the stuff of dreams? > > You are correct, if he is ineligible .. and *if he was at the time of > the introduction* then it should be challenged as not validly > introduced.. this will not be automatic though. > > Michelle > > > > Kind regards > > > > Paul Wilkins > > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:39, Paul Wilkins <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Seems Dutton is about to get a lesson in constitutional law: > > > > S44 (iv) holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any > > pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the > > revenues of the Commonwealth; or > > > > shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a > > member of the House of Representatives. > > > > Kind regards > > > > > > Paul Wilkins > > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 10:34, Paul Wilkins > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > After the Department Home Affairs sitting on this Bill for > > over a year and conducting industry consultation they claim is > > confidential (ie: they have no one who'll go on record > > supporting the Bill) suddenly it's a priority, and the > > Minister for Home Affairs writes a wheedling letter to PJCIS > > to pass the Bill before Christmas. > > > > The lack of public and industry consultation, the vague and > > poor drafting, and then a sudden push to pass the Bill in a > > couple of weeks, rather suggest a deliberate strategy to pass > > a Bill that's out of all proportion to the need to combat > > terrorism and serious crime in the context of rising use of > > encryption. > > > > Rising use of encryption is hardly news to anyone. After all, > > a rising tide lifts all boats. > > > > > > > https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=a46f0ed4-fc0d-4e95-bbd3-ef8fafe419ab&subId=663130 > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aph.gov.au%2FDocumentStore.ashx%3Fid%3Da46f0ed4-fc0d-4e95-bbd3-ef8fafe419ab%26subId%3D663130&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5088353822c44107106108d6540aaa92%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636788802123101945&sdata=uypPyRR0bgQ8gOcA7eI5U9cSKmUN61surcgpQFTklHY%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > Paul Wilkins > > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 13:56, Paul Wilkins > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > > > /"In practice, if they balls-up the change request given > > to the device manufacturer or app/website developer, > > anything could happen."/ > > > > Then you recall the obligation under the > > Telecommunications Act 1997 for carriers to "do their best > > to protect networks and facilities". No such obligation > > attaches to the Crown under the powers of the Assistance > > and Access Bill 2018. > > > > So, even if in the cases of misfeasance, non feasance, or > > malfeasance on the part of the Crown or its agents in the > > implementation of TCNs/TANs/TARs, and their impact on > > carriers businesses, liability rests, not with the Crown > > as you might ingenuously assume, but with the carrier who > > unwittingly acted as directed. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Paul Wilkins > > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 06:38, Scott Weeks > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > ----------------------- > > ...the drafting certainly seems loose enough for a future > > government to establishthe machinery of a police state. > > ----------------------- > > > > I'm seeing this in *NOG lists and elsewhere all over the > > world. It's going to be an interesting next buncha > years! > > > > scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AusNOG mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ausnog.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fausnog&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5088353822c44107106108d6540aaa92%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636788802123101945&sdata=omr6%2BdCSrRWABwWZF80YWqdJ9Ao7O%2FYWwK8%2BTMMB6u0%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AusNOG mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ausnog.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fausnog&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5088353822c44107106108d6540aaa92%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636788802123101945&sdata=omr6%2BdCSrRWABwWZF80YWqdJ9Ao7O%2FYWwK8%2BTMMB6u0%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AusNOG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ausnog.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fausnog&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5088353822c44107106108d6540aaa92%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636788802123101945&sdata=omr6%2BdCSrRWABwWZF80YWqdJ9Ao7O%2FYWwK8%2BTMMB6u0%3D&reserved=0> > > > -- > Michelle Sullivan > http://www.mhix.org/ > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mhix.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5088353822c44107106108d6540aaa92%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636788802123101945&sdata=9kOebH4dkP5BiBAIoVFbcAyb0t%2Bhz69mxHQXJ3ABn9k%3D&reserved=0> > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
