Just a quick comment:
The OGC involvement is way broader than the one singled out in the article 
below.
See the OGC membership ( search for Australia and Asia Pacific)
Many of these have active participation in different aspects of the OGC.

Thanks,
Martin
---
    
    Notable examples are Geoscience Australia and the Bureau of Meteorology. 
Both have also been working internationally to facilitate improved data 
interoperability within open standards bodies such as the Open Geospatial 
Consortium, the World Wide Web Consortium and the World Meteorological 
Organisation and the United Nations.
    
    The results are a range of spatial data services that are used widely by 
many Federal and State Government departments and also widely in industry. 
    
    Australia is also continuing the research work into SDI through the 
activities of the Cooperative Research Centre - Spatial Information [1].
    
    Work is also progressing to renovate the ASDI through initiatives such as: 
    
    - ANZLIC's 'Foundation Spatial Data Framework’ [2]
    
    - '2026 Spatial Industry Transformation and Growth Agenda’ [3]
    
    - National Environmental Infrastructure [4] and notably their National 
Principles for Environmental Information.
    
    These activities will have a transformative affect on the availability of 
and access to Australian data and should be supported and funded appropriately.
    
    
    
    [1] http://www.crcsi.com.au/research/3-spatial-infrastructures/ 
    
    [2] http://www.anzlic.gov.au/foundation-spatial-data-framework 
    
    [3] https://2026agenda.com/ 
    
    [4] http://www.neii.gov.au/about
    
    [5] 
http://www.bom.gov.au/environment/doc/national-principles-for-environmental-information.pdf
 
    
    </comment-BB>
    
    
    Kind regards,
    
    Bruce
    
    
    
    
    
    
    > On 19 Mar 2018, at 22:24, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
    > 
    > Folks,
    > 
    > An update on our suggestions for the next Open Government National Action 
Plan:
    > 
    > * We've included review feedback from scores of people, and a concise 
introduction, which starts:
    > 
    > Government bodies are continually duplicating effort. Why? Old 
acquisition processes have emphasised "value for money" and "mitigation of 
risk". However, in the digital economy, success indicators additionally include 
“effectiveness of collaboration”, “sustainability in the face of rapid 
innovation” and “resilience to monopolistic behaviours”. We need to consider 
these new indicators in our future purchasing guidelines. 
    > 
    > ... 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jNdh4_A_cIpaHqLRFOgpvAY3JSo0Ueraam39UHFOGHs/edit#
 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jNdh4_A_cIpaHqLRFOgpvAY3JSo0Ueraam39UHFOGHs/edit#>
    > * We've incorporated feedback from ~ 20 people so far. If you want review 
access, and to see review comments, please email me to request it.
    > * We're looking for technically savvy people who understand and believe 
that open government can collaborate better, to add their signatures to add 
gravity to the letter. Ask me for document access, or email me your name and 
big title for me to add for you.
    > All the best,
    > 
    > Cameron Shorter
    > On 5/3/18 8:27 am, Cameron Shorter wrote:
    >> Folks, 
    >> 
    >> Thanks to those of you who have reviewed the response to the proposed 
Open Government National Action Plan. And I know a number of you are planning 
to add more feedback this week. (In a nutshell: The response explains Open 
Government needs to learn how to collaborate as effectively as Open Source 
communities, and what government needs to change to make this happen). 
    >> 
    >> OSIA folks and Linux Australia Council, I'm formally requesting that 
this letter be presented jointly by Open Source Industry Australia (OSIA) and 
Linux Australia. What is involved in getting this permission? 
    >> 
    >> A status update: 
    >> 
    >> * The Linux Journal has offered to publish a piece on this. I'll be 
reaching out to other publications in the next couple of weeks to invite them 
to publish too. (Suggestions of publications welcomed). 
    >> 
    >> * I've incorporated most changes suggested so far. I've had a couple of 
people suggest a better introduction / exec summary - which I'll be working on. 
    >> 
    >> * I'm hoping to collate all preliminary feedback within the next 2 weeks 
(by ~ 16 March). 
    >> 
    >> * Deadline for delivery of our response is 30 March. 
    >> 
    >> Document is here: 
    >> 
    >> 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jNdh4_A_cIpaHqLRFOgpvAY3JSo0Ueraam39UHFOGHs/edit#
 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jNdh4_A_cIpaHqLRFOgpvAY3JSo0Ueraam39UHFOGHs/edit#>
 
    >> 
    >> Warm regards, Cameron 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> On 27/2/18 8:52 am, Cameron Shorter wrote: 
    >>> The Australian Government has asked for feedback on how they are going 
at Open Government, and I've started a draft response. I'm really keen to make 
sure that this response is well constructed because I think that if listened 
to, understood, and acted upon, then we can make a huge difference to the 
effectiveness of Open Government worldwide - and by extension, to Open Source 
as well. 
    >>> 
    >>> If you have a chance to read and provide review comments, I'd be very 
grateful. Email me directly to get review access. 
    >>> 
    >>> (It will take ~ 10 minutes to read. Longer if you take time to think 
about how things should be reworded and consider what is missing and should be 
included.) 
    >>> 
    >>> 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jNdh4_A_cIpaHqLRFOgpvAY3JSo0Ueraam39UHFOGHs/edit#heading=h.5zu4u4o3l7zi
 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jNdh4_A_cIpaHqLRFOgpvAY3JSo0Ueraam39UHFOGHs/edit#heading=h.5zu4u4o3l7zi>
 
    >>> 
    >> 
    > 
    > -- 
    > Cameron Shorter
    > Technology Demystifier, Learnosity
    > Open Technologies Consultant
    > 
    > M +61 (0) 419 142 254
    > _______________________________________________
    > Aust-NZ mailing list
    > Aust-NZ@lists.osgeo.org
    > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/aust-nz
    
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: 
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/aust-nz/attachments/20180321/565dc45c/attachment-0001.html>
    
    ------------------------------
    
    Subject: Digest Footer
    
    _______________________________________________
    Aust-NZ mailing list
    Aust-NZ@lists.osgeo.org
    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/aust-nz
    
    ------------------------------
    
    End of Aust-NZ Digest, Vol 118, Issue 6
    ***************************************
    
    

_______________________________________________
Aust-NZ mailing list
Aust-NZ@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/aust-nz

Reply via email to