A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1891 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                larryv
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Online Pubs
Issue ID:                   1891
Category:                   Base Definitions
Type:                       Omission
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Lawrence Velázquez 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
URL:                        see "Desired Action" 
Section:                    see "Desired Action" 
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2024-12-12 03:31 UTC
Last Modified:              2024-12-12 15:31 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Many function references lack "()" suffix
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0007002) dwheeler (reporter) - 2024-12-12 15:31
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1891#c7002 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
This typographical convention may appear odd to some readers, but it's
clearly documented, so there's nothing *wrong* here. Under "Typographical
Conventions"
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/frontmatter/typographics.html

It says:

C-Language Function | system()

It's unfortunate that the HTML translator changes this. I wish the
translator did't do this, I think it's a minor bug. That said, there's even
an out for this within POSIX: "The typographical conventions listed here
are for ease of reading only. Editorial inconsistencies in the use of
typography are unintentional and have no normative meaning in
POSIX.1-2024."

I find the suffix () helpful, but if people want to remove them from a
future version of POSIX, well, they can file that recommendation :-). 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2024-12-12 03:31 larryv         New Issue                                    
2024-12-12 03:31 larryv         Name                      => Lawrence Velázquez
2024-12-12 03:31 larryv         URL                       => see "Desired
Action"
2024-12-12 03:31 larryv         Section                   => see "Desired
Action"
2024-12-12 11:25 wakely         Note Added: 0006997                          
2024-12-12 14:24 geoffclare     Note Added: 0006999                          
2024-12-12 15:31 dwheeler       Note Added: 0007002                          
======================================================================


  • [Online Pubs... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Online... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to