austin-group-l  

Messages by Thread

• [Issue 8 drafts 0001471]: Add an orthogonal interface for immediate macro expansion definitions to make Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001471]: Add an orthogonal interface for immediate macro expansion definitions to make Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001471]: Add an orthogonal interface for immediate macro expansion definitions to make Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 13th May 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Availability of 202x Draft 2 review draft Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Availability of 202x Draft 2 review draft k...@keldix.com via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Today is the 80th anniversary of the computer Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 10th May 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 6th May 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001470]: tdelete example is incorrect Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Why can't a single condvar be used with multiple mutexes? Danny Niu via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Issue 8 drafts 0001469]: Inconsistent return type for tfind and tsearch Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001469]: Inconsistent return type for tfind and tsearch Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001469]: Inconsistent return type for tfind and tsearch Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001469]: Inconsistent return type for tfind and tsearch Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001469]: Inconsistent return type for tfind and tsearch Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 3rd May 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• POSIX gettext() and the locale category Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• POSIX gettext() and chdir() Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• POSIX gettext() and uselocale() Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• POSIX gettext() and the installation directories for .mo files Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• POSIX gettext() and the LANGUAGE environment variable Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• POSIX gettext() and iconv_open() Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Question regarding gettext behavior on iconv failure Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Question regarding gettext behavior on iconv failure Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Question regarding gettext behavior on iconv failure Carlos O'Donell via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Question regarding gettext behavior on iconv failure Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Question regarding gettext behavior on iconv failure Eric Ackermann via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Question regarding gettext behavior on iconv failure Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 29th April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 26th April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001468]: awk FS definition not quite correct Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001468]: awk FS definition not quite correct Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001468]: awk FS definition not quite correct Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001468]: awk FS definition not quite correct Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001468]: awk FS definition not quite correct Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 22nd April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 19th April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Issue 8 drafts 0001467]: Poor language in CHANGE HISTORY entry for Issue 8 for ':' command (defect 1272) changes. Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001467]: Poor language in CHANGE HISTORY entry for Issue 8 for ':' command (defect 1272) changes. Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001467]: Poor language in CHANGE HISTORY entry for Issue 8 for ':' command (defect 1272) changes. Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001467]: Poor language in CHANGE HISTORY entry for Issue 8 for ':' command (defect 1272) changes. Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001467]: Poor language in CHANGE HISTORY entry for Issue 8 for ':' command (defect 1272) changes. Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001467]: Poor language in CHANGE HISTORY entry for Issue 8 for ':' command (defect 1272) changes. Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Issue 8 drafts 0001466]: Pseudo-terminal devices should be renamed Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 15th April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• behavior of printf '\x61' Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: behavior of printf '\x61' Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: behavior of printf '\x61' shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: behavior of printf '\x61' Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: behavior of printf '\x61' Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: behavior of printf '\x61' Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• execve(2) optimisation for last command Martijn Dekker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: execve(2) optimisation for last command Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: execve(2) optimisation for last command Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: execve(2) optimisation for last command Martijn Dekker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: execve(2) optimisation for last command Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Defect 1272 (':' command) poor language Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Defect 1272 (':' command) poor language Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Defect 1272 (':' command) poor language Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000739]: CX requirements for strftime seem to conflict with ISO C Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000739]: CX requirements for strftime seem to conflict with ISO C Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000713]: in remquo quo should be unspecified when the result is NaN Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000713]: in remquo quo should be unspecified when the result is NaN Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000713]: in remquo quo should be unspecified when the result is NaN Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000713]: in remquo quo should be unspecified when the result is NaN Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 12th April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: Minutes of the 12th April 2021 Teleconference Fred J. Tydeman via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001285]: There should be a line-break before the 2nd trap in the synopsis Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Online Pubs 0001465]: trap synopsis missing newline Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Online Pubs 0001465]: trap synopsis missing newline Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Online Pubs 0001465]: trap synopsis missing newline Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Online Pubs 0001465]: trap synopsis missing newline Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Jan Hafer via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] David A. Wheeler via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] David A. Wheeler via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] David A. Wheeler via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [Shell Command Language][shortcomings of command utlity][improving robustness of POSIX shells] Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 8th April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001463]: Small discrepency between the description and the explanation Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001464]: grep(1): add -o option Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 1st April 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [2008-TC2 0001463]: Small discrepency between the description and the explanation Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 29th March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 25th March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001462]: Require (at least) 64-bit time_t Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 22nd March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001461]: tgamma() with negative integer argument Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 18th March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• sh: Assignments to PATH and XCU 2.9.1 Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: sh: Assignments to PATH and XCU 2.9.1 Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: sh: Assignments to PATH and XCU 2.9.1 Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: sh: Assignments to PATH and XCU 2.9.1 Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Interpretation starting a 30 day review (0001433) Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 15th March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001460]: hash implementations differ when a utility is not found Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Interpretation starting a 30 day review (0001427) Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 11th March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Online Pubs 0001459]: signgam.html differs from lgamma.html Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Online Pubs 0001459]: signgam.html differs from lgamma.html Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Online Pubs 0001458]: semctl missing first link to sys/sem.h Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Online Pubs 0001458]: semctl missing first link to sys/sem.h Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001457]: Add readlink(1) utility Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001456]: Permit implementations to add additional confstr()/pathconf()/sysconf() constants Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Bruno Haible via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Scott Lurndal via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Paul Eggert via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Fwd: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: SIGSTKSZ is now a run-time variable shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Sanity review draft of the Additional APIs for Base Specifications, Issue 8, Part 1 Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 8th March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 4th March 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 1st March February 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001455]: readv() and writev() are missing from the table of async-signal-safe functions Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001420]: Clarification: where are internal macros available? Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001420]: Clarification: where are internal macros available? Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001420]: Clarification: where are internal macros available? Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001420]: Clarification: where are internal macros available? Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001419]: Missing newline / indentation in .SCCS_GET default rule definition Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001419]: Missing newline / indentation in .SCCS_GET default rule definition Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001419]: Missing newline / indentation in .SCCS_GET default rule definition Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 25th February 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• Minutes of the 22nd February 2021 Teleconference Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
• [Issue 8 drafts 0001417]: Need to make sure that makefiles with += and ?= are portable to all make implementations Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001417]: Need to make sure that makefiles with += and ?= are portable to all make implementations Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001417]: Need to make sure that makefiles with += and ?= are portable to all make implementations Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 drafts 0001417]: Need to make sure that makefiles with += and ?= are portable to all make implementations Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

• Earlier messages