Messages by Thread
-
-
`set` unfindable on website
Andrew via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001879]: claifications/improvements around command/exec and special built-in redirection errors
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Minutes of the 21st November 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Shell developers/maintainers comments requested : bug 1876
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001878]: ISO editors Issue 8 comments 061+072
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001877]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 068
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001876]: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Minutes of the 14th November 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001875]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 056
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001874]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 052
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001873]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 114
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Minutes of the 7th November 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001872]: find: clarify "less safe" statement
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001871]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 031
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
is set -e ignored in trap when action executes while set -e is ignored?
Christoph Anton Mitterer via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001870]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 070
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001869]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 055
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Minutes of the 31st October 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
status of local sh variables
Andrew via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001868]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 051
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001867]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 046
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001866]: crontab: does not support Utility Syntax Guideline 13
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001865]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 053
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001864]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 045
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001863]: ISO editors Issue 8 comment 015
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Minutes of the 24th October 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001862]: Missing ETXTBSY error for fexecve()
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Andrew via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Lawrence Velázquez via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Rob Landley via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
G. Branden Robinson via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Andrew via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Andrew via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
David A. Wheeler via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Rob Landley via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
enh via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
David A. Wheeler via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Dmitry Goncharov via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Nick Stoughton via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Joshua M. Clulow via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Re: request: make [-j <concurrent job limit, default 4>]
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Minutes of the 17th October 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
Minutes of the 10th October 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001861]: xargs -L broken by bugid:243 resolution
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group