Messages by Date
-
2024/09/17
Re: 回复: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Mats Wichmann via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/17
Re: 回复: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/17
回复: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Niu Danny via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/16
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/16
Re: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/16
Re: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/16
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/15
Re: Minor modernizations for cron and find
Alan Coopersmith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/15
Re: Minor modernizations for cron and find
Lawrence Velázquez via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/15
Minor modernizations for cron and find
Andrew via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/15
回复: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Niu Danny via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/15
回复: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Niu Danny via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/14
Re: 回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/14
回复: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Niu Danny via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/14
Re: 回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/14
回复: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Niu Danny via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/14
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001857]: Several problems with the new "lazy" regex quantifier.
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/12
Interpretation for a 30 day review
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/12
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/11
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/11
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Alejandro Colomar via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/11
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Vincent Lefevre via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/11
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Vincent Lefevre via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Joseph Myers via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Vincent Lefevre via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
[Online Pubs 0001856]: FLT_MIN formula is b^{e_{\min-1}} instead of b^{e_{\min}-1}
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
[Online Pubs 0001856]: FLT_MIN formula is b^{e_{\min-1}} instead of b^{e_{\min}-1}
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Vincent Lefevre via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Re: Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/10
Is strnlen(0,0) valid?
Vincent Lefevre via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/06
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001855]: Use of freopen with different kinds of streams
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/06
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/06
Minutes of the 5th September 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001855]: Use of freopen with different kinds of streams
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[Issue 8 drafts 0001633]: Add memrchr
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000406]: add dd iflags=fullblock, for better pipe interaction
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001854]: dd iflags=fullblock should be iflag=fullblock
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001853]: xargs -x lost an important detail between Issue 6 and 7
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 668 216 233
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
CANCELED: Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 2558 300 2451
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
Re: XCU, dd: new iflags= operand is incompatible with, like, the very implementation it was standardising (which calls it iflag=) [406]
Lawrence Velázquez via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001854]: dd iflags=fullblock should be iflag=fullblock
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001854]: dd iflags=fullblock should be iflag=fullblock
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/04
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/03
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/03
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/03
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Martijn Dekker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/03
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/03
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/03
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/03
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Lawrence Velázquez via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Andrew Pennebaker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Paul Smith via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
Re: [1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001853]: xargs -x lost an important detail between Issue 6 and 7
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001853]: xargs -x lost an important detail between Issue 6 and 7
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001853]: xargs -x lost an important detail between Issue 6 and 7
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001853]: xargs -x lost an important detail between Issue 6 and 7
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/09/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001853]: xargs -x lost an important detail between Issue 6 and 7
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/30
Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 2558 300 2451
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/30
Minutes of the 29nd August 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/29
Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 668 216 233
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/27
Re: [Issue 8 drafts 0001633]: Add memrchr
Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/27
Re: [Issue 8 drafts 0001633]: Add memrchr
Jilles Tjoelker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/23
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/23
Re: Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Lawrence Velázquez via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/23
Proposal: Declare `make` default implicit rules for C++ projects
Andrew Pennebaker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/23
Re: [PATCH v3] ctime.3: EXAMPLES: Add example program
Hans Åberg via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/23
Re: [PATCH v3] ctime.3: EXAMPLES: Add example program
Paul Eggert via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/23
Re: [PATCH v3] ctime.3: EXAMPLES: Add example program
Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/23
Re: [Issue 8 drafts 0001633]: Add memrchr
Alejandro C via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/22
Draft minutes of the 22nd August 2024 Teleconference
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/22
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/22
[Issue 8 drafts 0001633]: Add memrchr
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/19
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/19
Re: Thread-safe equivalent of localeconv()
Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/19
Re: Thread-safe equivalent of localeconv()
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/19
Re: Thread-safe equivalent of localeconv()
Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/19
Re: Thread-safe equivalent of localeconv()
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/19
Re: Thread-safe equivalent of localeconv()
Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/18
POLLRDHUP
Thomas Munro via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/16
Re: Thread-safe equivalent of localeconv()
Corinna Vinschen via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
Thread-safe equivalent of localeconv()
Thomas Munro via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
Querying locale version information
Thomas Munro via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
Interpretation for a 30 day review
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
Minutes of the 15th August 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001851]: FD_CLOFORK should not be preserved across exec
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001318]: Define close-on-fork flag
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 668 216 233
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001851]: FD_CLOFORK should not be preserved across exec
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/15
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/14
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001852]: Clarify "$@[:$@:]" (with $# -eq 0)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/12
[Online Pubs 0001759]: line breaks missing in "Shell Command Language" code examples
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/10
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001851]: FD_CLOFORK should not be preserved across exec
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/10
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/10
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/09
Minutes of the 8th August 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
Re: <poll.h>: can some POLL* values be marked obsolescent?
Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
回复: <poll.h>: can some POLL* values be marked obsolescent?
Niu Danny via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
回复: <poll.h>: can some POLL* values be marked obsolescent?
Niu Danny via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 2559 791 7652
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001850]: Out of date note about reserved identifiers
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001849]: In mailx set command, "<b>no</b> <i>name</i>" should be "<b>no</b><i>name</i>"
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001848]: remove TOCTOU pid checking suggestions
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 668 216 233
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001848]: remove TOCTOU pid checking suggestions
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001846]: defect 1067 was only applied to socket() but applies to socketpair() too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001850]: Out of date note about reserved identifiers
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001849]: In mailx set command, "<b>no</b> <i>name</i>" should be "<b>no</b><i>name</i>"
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/08
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001849]: In mailx set command, "<b>no</b> <i>name</i>" should be "<b>no</b><i>name</i>"
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001846]: defect 1067 was only applied to socket() but applies to socketpair() too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001848]: remove TOCTOU pid checking suggestions
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/05
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001846]: defect 1067 was only applied to socket() but applies to socketpair() too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/05
[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001067]: missing socket() error for unsupported socket type
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/05
Draft minutes of the 1st August 2024 Teleconference
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/03
close-on-fork flag: existing implementation experience?
Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/02
Re: <poll.h>: can some POLL* values be marked obsolescent?
Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/02
<poll.h>: can some POLL* values be marked obsolescent?
Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001848]: remove TOCTOU pid checking suggestions
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/02
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/01
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001847]: dladdr()'s second argument should be Dl_info*, not Dl_info_t*
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/01
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/01
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001846]: defect 1067 was only applied to socket() but applies to socketpair() too
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/01
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/01
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/08/01
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001844]: Referenced Documents entry for ISO 6937 is out of date
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/31
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/30
Re: dladdr()'s second arg's type: when did it change to have an _t suffix?
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/29
Re: dladdr()'s second arg's type: when did it change to have an _t suffix?
Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/29
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/29
Re: dladdr()'s second arg's type: when did it change to have an _t suffix?
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/28
dladdr()'s second arg's type: when did it change to have an _t suffix?
Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/26
Minutes of the 25th July 2024 Teleconference
Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/26
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/26
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/26
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/26
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/26
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/26
Austin Group WEBEX +1-408-792-6300 PIN 668 216 233
Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001843]: description of O_EXEC+O_SEARCH not updated after defect 658
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001842]: The phrase "The…utility shall conform to the Utility Syntax Guidelines…" is never used normatively
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[Issue 8 drafts 0001841]: Example given for lex(1) has rules lacking mandatory action
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[Issue 8 drafts 0001841]: Example given for lex(1) has rules lacking mandatory action
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001628]: Add -o (reopen stdin) option to xargs(1)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001628]: Add -o (reopen stdin) option to xargs(1)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001628]: Add -o (reopen stdin) option to xargs(1)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[Issue 8 drafts 0001841]: Example given for lex(1) has rules lacking mandatory action
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[Online Pubs 0001628]: Add -o (reopen stdin) option to xargs(1)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/25
[Online Pubs 0001628]: Add -o (reopen stdin) option to xargs(1)
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/24
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/24
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/24
[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001821]: Define the values of $0, $1, etc. in the END section
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/24
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001813]: generic xargs description cleanups
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/24
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001806]: ambiguous description of which attributes `unset` unsets in case of readonly attribute being set
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/24
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001799]: endian.h unconditionally requires 64-bit integers
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/24
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001798]: Must posix_getdents remember file offsets across exec?
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/22
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/22
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001844]: Referenced Documents entry for ISO 6937 is out of date
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/22
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001844]: Referenced Documents entry for ISO 6937 is out of date
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/22
[Issue 8 drafts 0001665]: Contradictory text in descriptions of O_EXEC and O_SEARCH
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/22
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001843]: description of O_EXEC+O_SEARCH not updated after defect 658
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/22
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001843]: description of O_EXEC+O_SEARCH not updated after defect 658
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/22
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001843]: description of O_EXEC+O_SEARCH not updated after defect 658
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/21
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001843]: description of O_EXEC+O_SEARCH not updated after defect 658
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/20
[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001842]: The phrase "The…utility shall conform to the Utility Syntax Guidelines…" is never used normatively
Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/20
Re: Utility Syntax Guidelines compliance question
Lawrence Velázquez via austin-group-l at The Open Group
-
2024/07/20
Re: Utility Syntax Guidelines compliance question
Martijn Dekker via austin-group-l at The Open Group