A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1088 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                Mark_Galeck
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2
Issue ID:                   1088
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Clarification Requested
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Mark Galeck 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    2.10.1 Shell Grammar Lexical Conventions 
Page Number:                2375 
Line Number:                75892-75893 
Interp Status:              --- 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2016-10-18 10:58 UTC
Last Modified:              2016-10-19 09:17 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    "When more than one rule applies, the highest
numbered rule shall apply " is pointless
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0003431) kre (reporter) - 2016-10-19 09:17
 http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1088#c3431 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
As I interpret things, this issue is relayed to your issue 1093.
The "or applies globally" that you want to delete in 1093, I believe,
means "rule one always applies".   Hence any time another rule
explicitly applies, there are two, and the higher numbered one
takes precedence (and can then delegate back to rule 1 again if it wants,
as for example rule 7a does, sometimes.)

This all looks to be a rather convoluted way of getting the desired
result, but I don't believe it is incorrect. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2016-10-18 10:58 Mark_Galeck    New Issue                                    
2016-10-18 10:58 Mark_Galeck    Name                      => Mark Galeck     
2016-10-18 10:58 Mark_Galeck    Section                   => 2.10.1 Shell
Grammar Lexical Conventions
2016-10-18 10:58 Mark_Galeck    Page Number               => 2375            
2016-10-18 10:58 Mark_Galeck    Line Number               => 75892-75893     
2016-10-19 09:17 kre            Note Added: 0003431                          
======================================================================


Reply via email to