Geoff Clare <g...@opengroup.org> wrote:
> You may be thinking of utimensat(). We did not invent that, exactly,
> rather we standardised a minor variation of an existing interface.
OK at that time, utimesat() existed already.
> If you want to know what will happen if you submit a bug asking to
> add new "*at()" functions, you need look no further than bug 786 in
> which you did exactly that back in 2013 (for pathconfat()).
So what do you propose to do instead?
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
