On 8/7/19 4:43 PM, enh wrote: > What's the plan for the qsort_r interface, given that glibc and BSD have > mutually incompatible ones (which is why I didn't add it to Android)?
Per http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=900#c4112, FreeBSD was planning to switch over to the glibc signature, making it easier to standardize things as 'qsort_r' as presented in the bug, rather than as 'posix_qsort_r'. But as there is still a 30-day window for Open Group objections, we may very well receive an objection to the name 'qsort_r' where we would have to go with 'posix_qsort_r'. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
