shwaresyst <shwares...@aol.com> wrote, on 02 Apr 2020: > > This is not a duplicate, bug 315 covers only one case, this points out it > applies to other places. If anything it is a child, not duplicate, that's why > it was Accepted.
It was not "Accepted", it was "Accepted As Marked" and the resolution only adds EOVERFLOW to sem_post(), which is the same thing the resolution to bug 315 did. > On Thursday, April 2, 2020 Austin Group Bug Tracker <nore...@msnkbrown.net> > wrote: > > The following issue has been set as DUPLICATE OF issue 0000315. > ====================================================================== > https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=871 -- Geoff Clare <g.cl...@opengroup.org> The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England
