A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1602 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                kre
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Issue 8 drafts
Issue ID:                   1602
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Omission
Severity:                   Objection
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Robert Elz 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    XCU 2.14 exit   XCU 2.14 return 
Page Number:                2369, 2379 
Line Number:                76750, 77069 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2022-08-23 16:33 UTC
Last Modified:              2022-08-23 18:11 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    No definition of "executed in a trap action"
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0005941) kre (reporter) - 2022-08-23 18:11
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1602#c5941 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ugh, Mantis...   I had to cut & paste my entire report, as the first time
I tried to submit it, Mantis claimed a "security violation" or something,
(suggested I may have submitted already - which obviously, I did not),
which I suspect was caused simply by the (lengthy) period it took me to
fill in the form for this one (it was over an houir for sure).   I have
encountered similar before.

Anyway, I managed to miss cutting the first paragraph of the desired
action, which was intended to be:

  For "return" the definition of "executed in the trap action" probably
  should be "appears literally in the argument action to the trap command"
  which established the trap action now being taken.   No other return
should
  be considered.

I also ended up having had enough of this one, and didn't proof read
the report (almost at all) - consequently there are errors all over
the place (but I think the meaning is reasonably clear, despite that).

Pity Mantis has no way for ordinary mortals to edit their defect reports,
like it does for notes that were added, or I'd go back and clean up some
of the worst typos...

I wonder if I ever mentioned what I think of Mantis? 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2022-08-23 16:33 kre            New Issue                                    
2022-08-23 16:33 kre            Name                      => Robert Elz      
2022-08-23 16:33 kre            Section                   => XCU 2.14 exit   XCU
2.14 return
2022-08-23 16:33 kre            Page Number               => 2369, 2379      
2022-08-23 16:33 kre            Line Number               => 76750, 77069    
2022-08-23 18:11 kre            Note Added: 0005941                          
======================================================================


  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to