A NOTE has been added to this issue. ====================================================================== https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1602 ====================================================================== Reported By: kre Assigned To: ====================================================================== Project: Issue 8 drafts Issue ID: 1602 Category: Shell and Utilities Type: Omission Severity: Objection Priority: normal Status: New Name: Robert Elz Organization: User Reference: Section: XCU 2.14 exit XCU 2.14 return Page Number: 2369, 2379 Line Number: 76750, 77069 Final Accepted Text: ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2022-08-23 16:33 UTC Last Modified: 2022-08-23 18:11 UTC ====================================================================== Summary: No definition of "executed in a trap action" ======================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------- (0005941) kre (reporter) - 2022-08-23 18:11 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1602#c5941 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ugh, Mantis... I had to cut & paste my entire report, as the first time I tried to submit it, Mantis claimed a "security violation" or something, (suggested I may have submitted already - which obviously, I did not), which I suspect was caused simply by the (lengthy) period it took me to fill in the form for this one (it was over an houir for sure). I have encountered similar before. Anyway, I managed to miss cutting the first paragraph of the desired action, which was intended to be: For "return" the definition of "executed in the trap action" probably should be "appears literally in the argument action to the trap command" which established the trap action now being taken. No other return should be considered. I also ended up having had enough of this one, and didn't proof read the report (almost at all) - consequently there are errors all over the place (but I think the meaning is reasonably clear, despite that). Pity Mantis has no way for ordinary mortals to edit their defect reports, like it does for notes that were added, or I'd go back and clean up some of the worst typos... I wonder if I ever mentioned what I think of Mantis? Issue History Date Modified Username Field Change ====================================================================== 2022-08-23 16:33 kre New Issue 2022-08-23 16:33 kre Name => Robert Elz 2022-08-23 16:33 kre Section => XCU 2.14 exit XCU 2.14 return 2022-08-23 16:33 kre Page Number => 2369, 2379 2022-08-23 16:33 kre Line Number => 76750, 77069 2022-08-23 18:11 kre Note Added: 0005941 ======================================================================
