At 2023-04-24T08:41:23+0000, Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The 
Open Group wrote:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>  (0006271) geoffclare (manager) - 2023-04-24 08:41
>  https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1676#c6271 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> In Issue 6 just the initial 3 was bold; everything from <control-F> on was
> not. This changed in Issue 7 when we switched to groff and the cause is a
> difference between historical troff and groff. The source has:
> 
> .B 3\c
> 
> With groff the bold is retained for the lines following this, whereas with
> historical troff it was not.
> 
> Changing the line to:
> 
> .B 3 \c
> 
> will fix it. 

This seems as good (or as bad) a place as any to mention that I work on
groff quite a bit.  We're up to 1.23.0 release candidate 4 now.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/platform-testers/2023-04/msg00004.html

Y'all need something, holler.

Regards,
Branden

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... G. Branden Robinson via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to