A NOTE has been added to this issue. ====================================================================== https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1727 ====================================================================== Reported By: kre Assigned To: ====================================================================== Project: Issue 8 drafts Issue ID: 1727 Category: System Interfaces Type: Enhancement Request Severity: Objection Priority: normal Status: New Name: Robert Elz Organization: User Reference: Section: XSH 3 / strptime Page Number: 2146-7 Line Number: 70221-2, 70250-7 Final Accepted Text: ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2023-05-14 19:23 UTC Last Modified: 2023-05-16 08:57 UTC ====================================================================== Summary: strptime() spec needs updates to deal with other changes. ======================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------- (0006286) geoffclare (manager) - 2023-05-16 08:57 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1727#c6286 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > If the year were 12345 when output by strftime, then when scanned by strptime, stopping at 1234 can't be correct, can it? Yes it can, and the rationale for strftime has a table which includes exactly this example for %Y format. Issue History Date Modified Username Field Change ====================================================================== 2023-05-14 19:23 kre New Issue 2023-05-14 19:23 kre Name => Robert Elz 2023-05-14 19:23 kre Section => XSH 3 / strptime 2023-05-14 19:23 kre Page Number => 2146-7 2023-05-14 19:23 kre Line Number => 70221-2, 70250-7 2023-05-15 14:25 kre Note Added: 0006285 2023-05-15 14:28 kre Note Edited: 0006285 2023-05-16 08:57 geoffclare Note Added: 0006286 ======================================================================
