Authors, As we prepare this document (https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9718.txt and other formats) for publication, we have a final question.
RRSet vs. RRset: This document uses both forms (2 instances each; pasted below). RRset (lowercase 's') is much more common in RFCs. May we change the 2 instances to match common usage (and the later instances within 9718), even though the capital 'S' was used in RFC 7958? A reply from one author is sufficient at this stage. Thank you. RFC Editor/ar -- % grep RRSet rfc9718.txt In the DNSSEC protocol, Resource Record Sets (RRSets) are signed signatures that allow the integrity and authenticity of the RRSet to % grep RRset rfc9718.txt The DS RRset derived from this example is: The DNSKEY RRset derived from this example is: -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
