Arnt, The text in Appendix B.2 has been reverted as requested. The updated files are at the locations below.
At this point, I believe we are awaiting your reply to the following item. Pete wrote and I replied: >> I will defer to Arnt if he thinks differently, but I think updating to the >> new text from the erratum report seems like a good idea. > > Section 3 has been updated to match the new text on > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4029. We'll await word from Arnt before > proceeding. Thank you. RFC Editor/ar -- The changes can be seen in these files. https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.xml This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-rfcdiff.html (side by side) This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-lastrfcdiff.html This page shows the AUTH48 status of your document: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9755 > On Mar 13, 2025, at 4:25 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no> > wrote: > > Hi, > Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> writes: >> I hope you feel better soon. Thanks for letting us know. When you are up for >> it, the details are in my previous mail, with only the most recent changes >> here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755-lastrfcdiff.html > > I found one tiny thing. > > In section 8.2 you changed from > > define a FETCH item to return the MIME structure of a message > > to > > define a FETCH item to return the media type of the body of a message > > which isn't correct. What is returned is a larger structure containing the > media type and other information for all body parts, not just the media type > of one part. Not a major issue, but the old text was correct. > > Arnt -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
