IANA,

Please update your registries as follows to match the edited document at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html.


1) Please update the capitalization of the Name for the following Bit in the 
“PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV” registry 
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcecc-capability>.

Old: 
Bit     Name 
30      NATIVE IP (TEMPORARY - registered 2023-08-14, extension registered 
2024-07-31, expires 2025-08-14)

New: 
Bit     Name 
30      Native IP


2) Please update the following Error-values in the "PCEP-ERROR Object Error 
Types and Values” registry 
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-error-object> by adding 
a serial comma and removing hyphens.

Old:
Error-Type      Meaning                 Error-value
19                      Invalid Operation       22: Only one BPI, EPR or PPA 
object can be included in this message
                                                        29: Attempted Native-IP 
operations when the capability was not advertised
                                                        30: Unknown Native-IP 
Info

New:
Error-Type      Meaning                 Error-value
19                      Invalid Operation       22: Only one BPI, EPR, or PPA 
object can be included in this message
                                                        29: Attempted Native IP 
operations when the capability was not advertised
                                                        30: Unknown Native IP 
Info


3) Please update the name of the "CCI Object Flag Field for Native-IP” registry 
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#cci-object-flag-field-native-ip>
 by removing the hyphen between “Native” and “IP”.

Old:
CCI Object Flag Field for Native-IP

New:
CCI Object Flag Field for Native IP


4) Please update the commas to hyphens in the "BPI Object Error Code Field” 
registry 
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#bpi-object-error-code-field>.

Old:
Value   Meaning 
1               ASes does not match, BGP Session Failure 
2               Peer IP can't be reached, BGP Session Failure

New:
Value           Meaning 
1               ASes do not match - BGP Session Failure
2               Peer IP can't be reached - BGP Session Failure


5) Please update "(IPnIP)” to be "(IP-in-IP)” in the "BPI Object Flag Field” 
registry 
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#bpi-object-flag-field>.

Old:
Bit     Meaning 
7       T (IPnIP) bit

New:
Bit     Meaning
7       T (IP-in-IP) bit


Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Mar 10, 2025, at 12:45 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Authors and John (AD),
> 
> With John’s confirmation, we have removed Ren Tan as an author and moved his 
> name to the Contributors section. 
> 
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.xml
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.pdf
> 
> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff 
> between last version and this)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between 
> last version and this)
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9757
> 
> We will now ask IANA to update its registry accordingly. After the IANA 
> updates are complete, we will move forward with the publication process.
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 11:30 AM, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for the follow up. Yes please, since nobody has objected, let us do 
>> that.
>> 
>> —John
>> 
>>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 2:21 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi John,
>>> 
>>> We are just following up for your confirmation that Ren Tan should be moved 
>>> to the Contributors section.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> RFC Editor/ap
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 4:56 PM, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the info, Alanna.
>>>> 
>>>> Authors — if you have any input for me regarding the most appropriate 
>>>> course of action, please let me know in the next few days. If you would 
>>>> prefer to send me your feedback privately and confidentially, you can do 
>>>> that (but of course you don’t have to).
>>>> 
>>>> Unless I receive feedback suggesting some other course of action by 
>>>> Monday, I will request Ren Tan to be moved to the contributor section.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> —John
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 7:35 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> John - It seems the authors have been unable to contact Ren Tan for his 
>>>>> approval. As noted in the RFC Editor FAQ 
>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/*missingauthor__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HIjRag8oSVImlK5t9YVeaNwIjEfXdV1w8UiDAK63nov9JK7WijHVn9LzfhqAlcj7fbLS4qxBEPY3unuXuQmrFQE$
>>>>>  >, we recommend one of the following paths if the author is unreachable:
>>> 
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to