Stuart and Ted, With all due respect for your $dayjob workload, I keep wondering why these 2 RFC-to-be take so long (approved in April 2024 and in AUTH48 since September 2024!) to get moving.
If the authors want to remove these two RFC-to-be from the publication queue, i.e., do not publish them as they are, please let me know and I will investigate how they could be removed. “Perfect is the enemy of the good” and I would hate to abuse my AD power when actioning https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-statement-on-auth48-state-20060105/ Your documents are useful, in good shape, and well written, so let’s get them out. Regards -éric From: Stuart Cheshire <chesh...@apple.com> Date: Wednesday, 21 May 2025 at 02:27 To: Sarah Tarrant <starr...@staff.rfc-editor.org> Cc: Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com>, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com>, Chris Box <chris.box.i...@gmail.com>, dnssd-...@ietf.org <dnssd-...@ietf.org>, dnssd-cha...@ietf.org <dnssd-cha...@ietf.org>, auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9664 <draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08> for your review I reviewed the latest draft yesterday. I will confer with Ted tomorrow morning and then send my email reply. Stuart Cheshire
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
