Thomas, Thank you for your reply. The document has been updated accordingly, and then published: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9783
RFC Editor/ar > On Jun 13, 2025, at 12:52 AM, Thomas Fossati <thomas.foss...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > Hi Alice, > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 23:37, Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> Authors, >> >> A final question as we prepare your document for publication -- this line >> exceeds the 69-character limit of the sourcecode element by 3 characters: >> / eat_profile / 265: "tag:psacertified.org,2023:psa#tfm", >> >> For updating it, which of these options do you prefer? (or let us know if >> you prefer a different solution.) The line appears in Appendices A.1 and A.2. >> >> - Option A: moved "265:" to the left 3 characters. >> See https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9783-optA-diff.html > > This one. > >> - Option B: wrapped the line (similar to how other lines are already wrapped >> within the same element). >> See https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9783-optB-diff.html > > Not this one. The problem with this approach is that the CBOR tooling > interprets the new line in a text string literally (i.e., > "tag:psacertified.org,2023:ps\na#tfm" instead of > "tag:psacertified.org,2023:psa#tfm"). This is not a problem with the > byte strings. > >> At this point, a reply from one author is sufficient. >> >> Thank you. >> RFC Editor/ar >> -- >> >> The current files: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9783.txt >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9783.pdf >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9783.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9783.xml > > cheers, thanks! > t -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
