Hi Med and Alice, Thanks, yes I think Meds addition is an improvement. Do I need to make that change in the xml?
Alice, I will drop by Thursday morning to say hi! ~Tim On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:51 PM <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: > Hi Alice, Tim, all, > > I'm afraid that the new text may be conflicting when the following default > is disabled: > > LPD-6: By default, the IPv6 CE router filtering rules MUST allow > forwarding of packets with an outer IPv6 header containing a > source address belonging to delegated prefixes, along with > reciprocal packets from the same flow, following the > recommendations of [RFC6092]. > > Tim, I guess that you wanted to cover forwarding independent of the if. If > that's what you have in mind, maybe it is better to consider the following: > > NEW: > Absent explicit filtering, packets with destination > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > addresses in a delegated prefix MUST be forwarded to that > ^^^^^^^^^^ > prefix regardless of which interface they are received on. > > Also fixed a nit as this is about forwarding, not routing. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > > Envoyé : mardi 22 juillet 2025 17:23 > > À : Timothy Winters <t...@qacafe.com>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > > <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> > > Cc : v6ops-...@ietf.org; v6ops-cha...@ietf.org; rbon...@juniper.net; > > auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; RFC Editor <rfc- > > edi...@rfc-editor.org> > > Objet : [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9818 <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan- > > pd-09> for your review > > > > > > Tim, Med (as AD), > > > > ** Med, please review and let us know if you approve the following > > sentence, which Tim added to LPD-5. (This addition is also shown in > > the diff files below.) > > > > Packets with destination > > addresses in a delegated prefix MUST be routed to that > > prefix regardless of which interface they are received > > on. > > > > In context, it is: > > > > LPD-5: IPv6 CE routers MUST maintain a local routing table that > > is > > dynamically updated with leases and the associated next > > hops > > as they are delegated to clients. Packets with > > destination > > addresses in a delegated prefix MUST be routed to that > > prefix regardless of which interface they are received > > on. > > When a delegated prefix is released or expires, the > > associated route MUST be removed from the IPv6 CE > > router's > > routing table. A delegated prefix expires when the > > valid > > lifetime assigned in the IA_PD expires without being > > renewed. When a prefix is released or expires, it MUST > > be > > returned the pool of available prefixes. > > > > Tim, > > Thank you for your reply and the updated XML file. One note is > > below. The revised files are here (please refresh): > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair > > %40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb > > c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945781821185%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d > > 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjo > > iTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8mHpdfFdssVsvcCkWPevlUB > > ZmlkybSXgcKagC2xJ6oo%3D&reserved=0 > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair% > > 40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc > > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945781866625%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8 > > eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoi > > TWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sOOlY%2FsVQCN9XTD15%2Bf6 > > MTu4uVd8Mw5nH3Nwwc9Zr%2B0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair% > > 40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc > > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945781898947%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8 > > eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoi > > TWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vg3%2B6BrYT%2BJEV1A%2Fbd > > c9N7HobHwUB5QfRR2ANoL7pKY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair% > > 40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc > > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945781915277%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8 > > eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoi > > TWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gCeezemvRJ7SFPJJkt4Sv5oy > > ZtFLMFdroewSNUw%2FIrk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818- > > diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf1620 > > 5f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C > > 638887945781931742%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsI > > lYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D% > > 7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZIlv0Tci0fazVlRnXLmJCXnAhLcfWco1DmE2uw2tnKU%3D&re > > served=0 > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818- > > rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf1 > > 6205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0 > > %7C638887945781948200%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydW > > UsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D% > > 3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=POu2Or8t%2FzigZKCh8HlsrqrhvR6yUQr0doe4IH%2BCaT > > 0%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) > > > > This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818- > > auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf4a > > cf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0% > > 7C0%7C638887945781962011%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR > > ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ% > > 3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bgGSQOmixXKraNITZBqQaNsl1lKkImJKbWCXHLais8M > > %3D&reserved=0 > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818- > > auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cd > > f4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7 > > C0%7C0%7C638887945781976475%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki > > OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy > > fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Jtl%2Bv4FTPG1mwaN1mimVwOe9DCWSu9IzNflRN4 > > Eq0aY%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) > > > > We will wait to hear from you again and from your coauthors before > > continuing the publication process. This page shows the AUTH48 > > status of your document: > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9818&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40ora > > nge.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b92 > > 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945781990038%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFb > > XB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpb > > CIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d71h3P18TGCsE6%2F7KOb%2BOdhwr > > pE10DYF8yjS9UOLlzg%3D&reserved=0 > > > > FYI, in Section 1, added 's' as shown below; please let us know if > > that is not the intended meaning. > > > > OLD: The default configuration of CE router is designed to be a > > flat model to support zero-configuration networking. > > > > NEW: The default configuration of CE routers is designed to be a > > flat model to support zero-configuration networking. > > > > > > I'm here at IETF 123 at the RFC Editor desk (near registration) if > > you want to come by and say hello. Will also be here Wed. afternoon > > and Thur. morning. > > > > Thank you. > > RFC Editor/ar > > > > > On Jul 22, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Timothy Winters <t...@qacafe.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alice, > > > > > > Here is the updated xml file, I responded to all the questions in > > the xml. Let me know if there are unresolved issues. > > > > > > ~Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 4:15 PM Timothy Winters <t...@qacafe.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi Alice, > > > > > > Thanks I have started reviewing the changes and will have an > > update this week. > > > > > > ~Tim > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 3:16 PM Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc- > > editor.org> wrote: > > > Tim, > > > > > > This is a reminder that we await word from you regarding the > > questions below and this document's readiness for publication as an > > RFC. The files are here: > > > > > > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w. > > > rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada > > > > > ir%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40b > > fb > > > > > c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782003501%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d > > 8e > > > > > yJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiT > > WF > > > > > pbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mTh5RVEyvheiVqn7MIc2muzbSww > > LV > > > nYR1b6T91ZMF1E%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w. > > > rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai > > > > > r%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bf > > bc > > > > > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782017070%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8 > > ey > > > > > JFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTW > > Fp > > > > > bCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vCCkXFgpKNbfkMY2EAbOr2vdlnJM > > dR > > > Eg2cXZefIFFgk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w. > > > rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai > > > > > r%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bf > > bc > > > > > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782032979%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8 > > ey > > > > > JFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTW > > Fp > > > > > bCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=z6eRSbwo02%2FPEIrBP5Rhj5cFk2 > > HZ > > > lzb32W%2FQOMJ8O7o%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w. > > > rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai > > > > > r%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bf > > bc > > > > > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782054380%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8 > > ey > > > > > JFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTW > > Fp > > > > > bCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NNI4PnsOQfgdNYPxA%2Bdm%2BJXU > > qO > > > KAWwhgMZKVcz%2F3bLg%3D&reserved=0 (source) > > > > > > Diff files of all changes from the approved Internet-Draft: > > > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w. > > > rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818- > > diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bo > > > > > ucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af3 > > 4b > > > > > 40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782074509%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG > > Zs > > > > > b3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO > > Ij > > > > > oiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=L8dnyGUfVGAjZ7CIeWzqBg > > 6p > > > uwi9Qegtuh%2F7xDKbbOI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w. > > > rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818- > > rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed > > > > > .boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20 > > af > > > > > 34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782095866%7CUnknown%7CTWF > > pb > > > > > GZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsI > > kF > > > > > OIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EAJRSbgfiEO%2BhuL6M > > yz > > > nWj5%2BiOS1zqhw4KYD7Wog%2B6Q%3D&reserved=0 (side by side) > > > > > > This page shows the AUTH48 status of your document: > > > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w. > > > rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9818&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o > > > > > range.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b > > 92 > > > > > 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782118058%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFb > > XB > > > > > 0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCI > > sI > > > > > ldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kd88jLPeyQHg1pAck%2BGkOEPp31TWShl > > BH > > > 4PvYb9J9Bw%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > Thank you. > > > RFC Editor/ar > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 2025, at 5:51 PM, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > While reviewing this document during AUTH48 > > (https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw > > ww.rfc- > > editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9818.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair > > %40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb > > c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638887945782141545%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d > > 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjo > > iTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=C5aEjRWYOEqgQGEFXTGLnYK > > %2FjotDJ6OX%2FlLBFd7qu7g%3D&reserved=0 and other formats), please > > resolve the following questions, which are also in the XML file. > > > > > > > > 1) <!-- [rfced] How may this title be rephrased for clarity? > > > > Also, is "LAN" needed in this title? (Neither "LAN" nor "local" > > is > > > > mentioned in the abstract.) Do either of these options convey > > the intended meaning? > > > > Please feel free to suggest otherwise. > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > IPv6 CE Routers LAN DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation > > > > > > > > Current: > > > > IPv6 Customer Edge (CE) Routers LAN DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation > > > > > > > > Option A: > > > > DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation on IPv6 Customer Edge (CE) Routers in > > LANs > > > > > > > > Option B: > > > > DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in LANs for IPv6 Customer Edge (CE) > > Routers > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) <!--[rfced] For clarity, how may this be rephrased? In > > > > particular, the phrase "CE Router supporting prefix delegation" > > is unclear. > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > The default configuration of CE Router supporting prefix > > > > delegation is designed to be a flat model to support zero > > > > configuration networking. > > > > > > > > Perhaps: > > > > For prefix delegation that supports CE routers, the default > > > > configuration is designed to be a flat model to support > > > > zero-configuration networking. > > > > > > > > Or simply: > > > > For prefix delegation that supports CE routers, the default > > > > configuration is a flat model to support zero-configuration > > > > networking. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) <!--[rfced] Please clarify "multi-provisioned networks". Is > > there > > > > another term that is more common? The term "multi-provisioned" > > > > does not appear in past RFCs or current Internet-Drafts. > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > This document does not cover dealing with multi-provisioned > > > > networks with more than one provider. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) <!--[rfced] Which update do you prefer, as this definition is > > > > missing 'the', but perhaps you prefer to match the cited > > document? > > > > > > > > Original: IPv6 node: A device that implements IPv6 protocol. > > > > > > > > Option A: IPv6 node: A device that implements IPv6. > > > > (to match RFC 8200, which is cited in the lead-in text) > > > > > > > > Option B: IPv6 node: A device that implements the IPv6 > > protocol. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 5) <!-- [rfced] FYI, for expanding GUA, "Unique" has been > > changed to > > > > "Unicast" in order to match RFC 4291. Please review. > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > * GUA:Global Unique Addresses, as defined in [RFC4291]. > > > > > > > > Current: > > > > GUA: Global Unicast Address, as defined in [RFC4291]. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6) <!--[rfced] Please clarify; how should this fragment be > > updated > > > > to be a sentence? > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > The end-user network for IPv6 that is a stub network. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 7) <!--[rfced] Please review this update for accuracy; due to > > "its", > > > > the subject ("IPv6 CE routers") has been changed to singular. It > > > > currently reads that a single router could have more than one > > LAN interface. > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > LPD-1: IPv6 CE routers MUST support IPv6 prefix assignment > > > > according to Section 13.3 of [RFC8415] (Identity > > Association > > > > for Prefix Delegation (IA_PD) option) on its LAN > > > > interface(s). > > > > > > > > Current: > > > > LPD-1: Each IPv6 CE router MUST support IPv6 prefix > > assignment > > > > according to Section 13.3 of [RFC8415] (Identity > > Association > > > > for Prefix Delegation (IA_PD) option) on its LAN > > > > interface(s). > > > > > > > > Alternatively (both plural): > > > > LPD-1: IPv6 CE routers MUST support IPv6 prefix assignment > > > > according to Section 13.3 of [RFC8415] (Identity > > Association > > > > for Prefix Delegation (IA_PD) option) on their LAN > > > > interfaces. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 8) <!--[rfced] Because the second sentence is singular, should > > the > > > > first sentence be parallel? > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > LPD-2: IPv6 CE routers MUST assign a prefix from the > > delegated > > > > prefix as specified by L-2 in Section 4.3 of > > [RFC7084]. If > > > > insufficient prefixes are available the IPv6 CE Router > > MUST > > > > log a system management error. > > > > > > > > Perhaps: > > > > LPD-2: Each IPv6 CE router MUST assign a prefix from the > > delegated > > > > prefix as specified by L-2 in Section 4.3 of > > [RFC7084]. If > > > > insufficient prefixes are available, the IPv6 CE > > router MUST > > > > log a system management error. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 9) <!--[rfced] Should "both ULA and GUA" be both "ULAs and > > GUAs"? If > > > > so, please review whether "the GUA" is accurate in the second > > phrase. > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > LPD-9: If an IPv6 CE router is provisioning both ULA and GUA > > via > > > > prefix delegation, the GUA SHOULD appear first in the > > DHCPv6 > > > > packets. > > > > > > > > Perhaps: > > > > LPD-9: If an IPv6 CE router is provisioning both ULAs and > > GUAs via > > > > prefix delegation, the GUA SHOULD appear first in the > > DHCPv6 > > > > packets. > > > > > > > > Or (singular): > > > > LPD-9: If an IPv6 CE router is provisioning both the ULA and > > the GUA via > > > > prefix delegation, the GUA SHOULD appear first in the > > DHCPv6 > > > > packets. > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 10) <!--[rfced] Terminology > > > > > > > > a) This term appeared inconsistently and has been updated to the > > latter. > > > > Please let us know if you prefer otherwise. > > > > > > > > CE Router vs. CE router [based on usage in RFC 7084] > > > > > > > > b) Capitalization of these terms is not consistent. Please let > > us > > > > know your preference. > > > > > > > > Prefix Delegation vs. prefix delegation > > > > > > > > Delegated Prefix (in LPD-6) vs. delegated prefix (in LPD-2, > > LPD-5) > > > > > > > > c) Please review usage of this term and let us know if any > > updates are needed. > > > > We note RFC 8415 uses the hyphen for the "prefix-length" field. > > > > > > > > prefix-length (3 instances) vs. prefix length (2 instances) > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > 11) <!-- [rfced] FYI, the original URL provided for [eRouter] is > > to > > > > the most recent version of this CableLabs specification, Version > > > > I22, which was published in May 2024, so we updated the > > reference as follows. > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > [eRouter] CableLabs, "IPv4 and IPv6 eRouter Specification > > Version > > > > I21", February 2022, > > > > > > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw > > ww.cablelabs.com%2Fspecifications%2FCM-SP- > > eRouter&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f > > 4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63 > > 8887945782163947%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlY > > iOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C > > 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XaNipH6wM%2FsVGIZg0UZLCyeameGXXKgnaB5HVxiBMyM%3D&re > > served=0>. > > > > > > > > Current: > > > > [eRouter] CableLabs, "IPv4 and IPv6 eRouter Specification", > > Data- > > > > Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications, Version > > I22, > > > > May 2024, > > > > > > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw > > ww.cablelabs.com%2Fspecifications%2FCM-SP- > > eRouter&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf4acf16205f > > 4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63 > > 8887945782185062%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlY > > iOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C > > 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mnpN8EcujQHWO4T4Cl%2FYps%2BKbnKdCQlEti%2FYAa4iI38%3 > > D&reserved=0>. > > > > > > > > Re: "in Section 8.5 of CableLabs IPv6 eRouter specification > > > > [eRouter]", we note that Section 8.5 has the same title in I21 > > and I122. > > > > However, if you prefer to reference Version I21, please let us > > know > > > > (and in that case, we recommend this URL: > > > > > > https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww > > w.cablelabs.com%2Fspecifications%2FCM-SP- > > eRouter%3Fv%3DI21&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdf > > 4acf16205f4e496afa08ddc933a2a7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C > > 0%7C0%7C638887945782206601%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiO > > nRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyf > > Q%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=h4hLrAgXFhEVVB%2FGYhIUYUqXp5JaIpTd4BPmEuv > > KeZQ%3D&reserved=0). > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > RFC Editor/ar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 2025, at 6:01 PM, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > > > > > > > Tim, > > > > > > > > One additional question: > > > > > > > > 12) Re: LPD-6, what does "that is not assigned" refer to? As far > > as verb agreement, it does not match "packets". > > > > > > > > Original: > > > > IPv6 CE routers MUST continue to drop packets including > > destination > > > > address that is not assigned to the LAN or delegated. > > > > > > > > Perhaps: > > > > IPv6 CE routers MUST continue to drop packets, including > > destination > > > > address, that are not assigned to the LAN or delegated. > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > RFC Editor/ar > > > > > > > > > > > > <rfc9818.xml> > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
