On Mon, Sep 22, 2025, at 17:25, Alanna Paloma wrote: > Hi Authors, > > This is a friendly reminder that we await your reviews and approvals of > the updated files prior to moving this document in the publication > process. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9869.xml > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9869.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9869.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9869.pdf > > The relevant diff files have been posted here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9869-diff.html (comprehensive > diff) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9869-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 > changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9869-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 > changes side by side) > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9869
HI Alanna, Ah, I misunderstood your previous message and thought we were waiting for a clarification from rfc 9968-tobe. I have reviewed this version and am happy. Tom -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
