Authors, We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 page for this document (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9877). We will move this document forward in the publication process.
Thank you for your time. Alice Russo RFC Production Center > On Oct 9, 2025, at 2:35 PM, Jasdip Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Jasdip > >> On Oct 9, 2025, at 4:35 PM, Tom Harrison <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Alice, >> >>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 11:06:54AM -0700, Alice Russo wrote: >>> Thank you for your replies; please see one follow-up below. The revised >>> files are here (please refresh): >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.txt >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.pdf >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.xml >>> >>> This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>> >>> This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-auth48diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>> >>> Re: Section 1, in addition to removing 'they' as Tom requested, we've >>> removed the comma and updated to 'features' plural. Previously, the comma >>> indicated two independent clauses. >>> >>> Original: >>> Indentation and whitespace in examples are provided only to >>> illustrate element relationships, and are not a required feature of >>> this specification. >>> >>> Current text: >>> Indentation and whitespace in examples are provided only to >>> illustrate element relationships and are not required features >>> of this specification. >>> >>> Alternatively, please let us know if you prefer: >>> In examples, indentation and whitespace are provided only to >>> illustrate element relationships: neither is a required feature >>> of this specification. >>> >>> We will wait to hear from you again and from your coauthors >>> before continuing the publication process. This page shows >>> the AUTH48 status of your document: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9877 >> >> Thanks for these updates. The suggested text (i.e. "Indentation and >> whitespace in examples are provided only to illustrate element >> relationships and are not required features of this specification") >> looks fine to me. I approve for publication. >> >> -Tom -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
